Tools & Wizards About Us
likestat.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 57

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

likestat.com

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

657 ms

likestat.com screenshot

About Website

Visit likestat.com now to see the best up-to-date Likestat content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about likestat.com

Website traffic, alexa rank of top websites and free seo tools. Instantly check website value and site traffic of any website with Likestat.

Visit likestat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Likestat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

likestat.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

75/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,900 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

likestat.com

304 ms

bootstrap.css

319 ms

style_frontend.css

576 ms

jquery.min.js

52 ms

bootstrap.min.js

629 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Likestat.com, 13% (14 requests) were made to Google.com and 11% (11 requests) were made to T1.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 63.6 kB (15%)

Content Size

427.1 kB

After Optimization

363.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Likestat.com main page is 427.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 219.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 37.1 kB

  • Original 44.0 kB
  • After minification 38.0 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 219.4 kB
  • After minification 203.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Likestat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 143.2 kB
  • After minification 143.2 kB
  • After compression 134.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 20.4 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Likestat.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (74%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Likestat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

likestat.com

likestat.com

304 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

319 ms

style_frontend.css

style_frontend.css

576 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

52 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

629 ms

app.js

app.js

628 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

79 ms

js

js

79 ms

hotjar-1747260.js

hotjar-1747260.js

495 ms

pattern_paper.png

pattern_paper.png

811 ms

logo.png

logo.png

797 ms

favicons

favicons

798 ms

favicons

favicons

797 ms

favicons

favicons

865 ms

favicons

favicons

864 ms

favicons

favicons

1205 ms

favicons

favicons

1207 ms

favicons

favicons

1204 ms

favicons

favicons

1203 ms

favicons

favicons

1204 ms

favicons

favicons

1202 ms

favicons

favicons

1316 ms

favicons

favicons

1335 ms

favicons

favicons

1347 ms

favicons

favicons

1338 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

324 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

592 ms

glyphicons-halflings.png

glyphicons-halflings.png

438 ms

tag.png

tag.png

805 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

555 ms

top.png

top.png

688 ms

modules.bcd9ade6b0bb9bdd0789.js

modules.bcd9ade6b0bb9bdd0789.js

493 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

664 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

460 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

455 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

499 ms

ads

ads

1490 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

418 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

464 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

463 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

528 ms

ads

ads

867 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

528 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

527 ms

ads

ads

638 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

446 ms

ads

ads

743 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

427 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

483 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

468 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

467 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

344 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

408 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

338 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

399 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

396 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

403 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

388 ms

collect

collect

281 ms

visit-data

visit-data

643 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

134 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

132 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

141 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

136 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

158 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

124 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

59 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

75 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

53 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

44 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

34 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

37 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

32 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

30 ms

faviconV2

faviconV2

32 ms

downsize_200k_v1

downsize_200k_v1

218 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

212 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

193 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

359 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

207 ms

rx_lidar.js

rx_lidar.js

363 ms

fac60d4cdc0b8be56d9f8d6f9ac54a3d.js

fac60d4cdc0b8be56d9f8d6f9ac54a3d.js

357 ms

icon.png

icon.png

178 ms

5bbe539ad7c95ad1b7dc2874c2ab6f46.js

5bbe539ad7c95ad1b7dc2874c2ab6f46.js

575 ms

2c31c29323708f8c18cb525f4f35abd1.js

2c31c29323708f8c18cb525f4f35abd1.js

582 ms

s

s

555 ms

css

css

259 ms

reactive_library.js

reactive_library.js

274 ms

activeview

activeview

70 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

120 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

240 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

390 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

360 ms

css2

css2

368 ms

shopping

shopping

451 ms

57d1ab5f26c7e10f1646c6ff79d34874.js

57d1ab5f26c7e10f1646c6ff79d34874.js

193 ms

interstitial_ad_frame.js

interstitial_ad_frame.js

162 ms

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

156 ms

settings_grey600_24dp.png

settings_grey600_24dp.png

132 ms

15289634550268635225

15289634550268635225

108 ms

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

65 ms

16098744774579995403

16098744774579995403

259 ms

css

css

330 ms

activeview

activeview

83 ms

Accessibility Review

likestat.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

likestat.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

likestat.com SEO score

57

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Likestat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Likestat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

likestat.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Likestat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: