Tools & Wizards About Us
lilapark.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

lilapark.net

Wesela Szczecin Sala weselna w Szczecinie sala na wesele Lila Park Szczecin

Page Load Speed

8.1 sec in total

First Response

994 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

lilapark.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lila Park content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lilapark.net

Sala weselna Lila Park w Szczecinie to dokonałem miejsce na wesele. Najlepsze wesela w Szczecinie odbywają się w na naszej przestronnej sali. Zapraszamy Pary Młode!

Visit lilapark.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lilapark.net page load time and found that the first response time was 994 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lilapark.net performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lilapark.net

994 ms

script.js

33 ms

style.min.css

284 ms

bootstrap.min.css

437 ms

style.css

576 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Lilapark.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Lilapark.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lilapark.net main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 126.6 kB

  • Original 157.7 kB
  • After minification 155.1 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 40.9 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lila Park images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 32.1 kB

  • Original 327.9 kB
  • After minification 327.9 kB
  • After compression 295.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 104.8 kB

  • Original 264.2 kB
  • After minification 208.7 kB
  • After compression 159.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lilapark.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.8 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (71%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lila Park. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lilapark.net

www.lilapark.net

994 ms

script.js

script.js

33 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

284 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

437 ms

style.css

style.css

576 ms

kd_vc_front.css

kd_vc_front.css

564 ms

log

log

406 ms

field_social_profiles_frontend.css

field_social_profiles_frontend.css

243 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

404 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

337 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

354 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

558 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

449 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

497 ms

kd_addon_script.js

kd_addon_script.js

514 ms

js

js

66 ms

css

css

41 ms

css

css

19 ms

iconsmind-Business-Finance.css

iconsmind-Business-Finance.css

605 ms

js_composer_tta.min.css

js_composer_tta.min.css

605 ms

photoswipe.css

photoswipe.css

604 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

606 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

804 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

958 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

683 ms

SmoothScroll.js

SmoothScroll.js

684 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

686 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

803 ms

kd_countto.js

kd_countto.js

822 ms

vc-accordion.min.js

vc-accordion.min.js

821 ms

vc-tta-autoplay.min.js

vc-tta-autoplay.min.js

821 ms

vc-tabs.min.js

vc-tabs.min.js

821 ms

photoswipe.min.js

photoswipe.min.js

879 ms

logo.png

logo.png

401 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

400 ms

wesele-brazowe.jpg

wesele-brazowe.jpg

402 ms

wesele-srebrne.jpg

wesele-srebrne.jpg

488 ms

wesele-zlote.jpg

wesele-zlote.jpg

592 ms

wesele-diamentowe.jpg

wesele-diamentowe.jpg

620 ms

wesele5.jpg

wesele5.jpg

628 ms

wesele4.jpg

wesele4.jpg

628 ms

sala1.jpg

sala1.jpg

883 ms

sala2.jpg

sala2.jpg

766 ms

Obraz-5.jpg

Obraz-5.jpg

1502 ms

wesele2.jpg

wesele2.jpg

1503 ms

zabawa4.jpg

zabawa4.jpg

1547 ms

zabawa2.jpg

zabawa2.jpg

925 ms

wina.jpg

wina.jpg

1748 ms

stories_pl_locations.jpg

stories_pl_locations.jpg

1005 ms

logo128x128przezroczystetloszarewypelnienieborderzaokraglony.png

logo128x128przezroczystetloszarewypelnienieborderzaokraglony.png

1038 ms

home-decor-lines3.png

home-decor-lines3.png

572 ms

dots.svg

dots.svg

1075 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

79 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

80 ms

sway-font.woff

sway-font.woff

1113 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1406 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1404 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1376 ms

Business-Finance.woff

Business-Finance.woff

1240 ms

Accessibility Review

lilapark.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lilapark.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lilapark.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lilapark.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lilapark.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lilapark.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lila Park. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: