Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

lilaste.eu

Atpūtas komplekss Lilaste Makšķerēšana, atpūta uz ūdens, dienas un vakara atpūta, sportiska makšķerēšanas atpūta, pludmale, banketu zāle, laba virtuve...

Page Load Speed

22.1 sec in total

First Response

715 ms

Resources Loaded

21 sec

Page Rendered

392 ms

lilaste.eu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lilaste.eu homepage info - get ready to check Lilaste best content for Latvia right away, or after learning these important things about lilaste.eu

Atpūtas komplekss Lilaste Makšķerēšana atpūta uz ūdens dienas un vakara atpūta sportiska makšķerēšanas atpūta pludmale banketu zāle laba virtuve un kvalitatīvi viesnīcas numuri

Visit lilaste.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Lilaste.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 715 ms and then it took 21.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lilaste.eu performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,480 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.398

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lilaste.eu

715 ms

main.css

112 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

8 ms

stickymenu.php

250 ms

main.php

251 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Lilaste.eu, 11% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.3 sec) relates to the external source Openstat.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 345.1 kB (15%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Lilaste.eu main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 136.9 kB

  • Original 163.2 kB
  • After minification 158.2 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lilaste images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 203.4 kB

  • Original 785.5 kB
  • After minification 785.3 kB
  • After compression 582.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.4 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 932 B

  • Original 64.2 kB
  • After minification 64.2 kB
  • After compression 63.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lilaste.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (49%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lilaste. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lilaste.eu accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

lilaste.eu best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lilaste.eu SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    LV

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lilaste.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Latvian/Lettish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lilaste.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lilaste. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: