Tools & Wizards About Us
lilchampsvote.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

lilchampsvote.in

Top 10 SaReGaMaPa Lil Champs Vote Zee 5 App, Missed Call Nos Contestants VOTING, Elimination, Winner

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

33 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

487 ms

lilchampsvote.in screenshot

About Website

Visit lilchampsvote.in now to see the best up-to-date Lil Champs Vote content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lilchampsvote.in

SaReGaMaPa Lil Champs 2022 VOTE Zee5, Voting Missed Call Nos, Android, iOS App, Top 10 Contestants Voting, Elimination, Winner Name 2022.

Visit lilchampsvote.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Lilchampsvote.in page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lilchampsvote.in performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value12,660 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.123

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lilchampsvote.in

33 ms

www.lilchampsvote.in

141 ms

www.lilchampsvote.in

146 ms

55013136-widget_css_bundle.css

40 ms

adsbygoogle.js

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Lilchampsvote.in, 59% (32 requests) were made to Blogger.googleusercontent.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Blogger.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Blogger.googleusercontent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.4 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lilchampsvote.in main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 100.1 kB

  • Original 125.0 kB
  • After minification 122.8 kB
  • After compression 25.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lil Champs Vote images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 443 B

  • Original 100.7 kB
  • After minification 100.7 kB
  • After compression 100.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 6.6 kB
  • After minification 6.6 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lilchampsvote.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (31%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lil Champs Vote. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lilchampsvote.in

lilchampsvote.in

33 ms

www.lilchampsvote.in

www.lilchampsvote.in

141 ms

www.lilchampsvote.in

www.lilchampsvote.in

146 ms

55013136-widget_css_bundle.css

55013136-widget_css_bundle.css

40 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

69 ms

css

css

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

41 ms

related%20posts%20js.js

related%20posts%20js.js

151 ms

embed.js

embed.js

97 ms

pagenavigation.txt.js

pagenavigation.txt.js

59 ms

js

js

95 ms

984859869-widgets.js

984859869-widgets.js

42 ms

summary

summary

287 ms

lilchampsvote_logo.JPG

lilchampsvote_logo.JPG

577 ms

top%206%20saregamapa%20lil%20champs%20finalists.JPG

top%206%20saregamapa%20lil%20champs%20finalists.JPG

583 ms

jetshen%20lama%20lil%20champs%20winner.JPG

jetshen%20lama%20lil%20champs%20winner.JPG

516 ms

lil%20champs%20vote%20missed%20call%20nos.JPG

lil%20champs%20vote%20missed%20call%20nos.JPG

570 ms

asham%20ali%20elimination%20saregamapa%20lil%20champs%202022.JPG

asham%20ali%20elimination%20saregamapa%20lil%20champs%202022.JPG

525 ms

rajdeep%20harmer.JPG

rajdeep%20harmer.JPG

562 ms

Dyaneshwari%20Ghadge.JPG

Dyaneshwari%20Ghadge.JPG

934 ms

aarohi%20soni.JPG

aarohi%20soni.JPG

994 ms

rafa%20yasmeen.JPG

rafa%20yasmeen.JPG

1198 ms

raajdeep%20gosh.JPG

raajdeep%20gosh.JPG

1054 ms

jetsen.JPG

jetsen.JPG

901 ms

harmeher.JPG

harmeher.JPG

1045 ms

atanu%20mishra.JPG

atanu%20mishra.JPG

1308 ms

asham%20ali%20khan.JPG

asham%20ali%20khan.JPG

1279 ms

devika%20sharma.JPG

devika%20sharma.JPG

1364 ms

atharv%20bakshi.JPG

atharv%20bakshi.JPG

1624 ms

palakshi.JPG

palakshi.JPG

1513 ms

harsh%20sikandar.JPG

harsh%20sikandar.JPG

1872 ms

prajyot.JPG

prajyot.JPG

1637 ms

saregamapa%20little%20champs%20episode%201.JPG

saregamapa%20little%20champs%20episode%201.JPG

1835 ms

saregamapa%20lil%20champs%202022%20judges%20host.JPG

saregamapa%20lil%20champs%202022%20judges%20host.JPG

1825 ms

srgmp+elimination+list.JPG

srgmp+elimination+list.JPG

1914 ms

farhan+kinjal+elimination+saregamapa.JPG

farhan+kinjal+elimination+saregamapa.JPG

1963 ms

arvind+raju.JPG

arvind+raju.JPG

2103 ms

saregamapa+2021+grand+juries.JPG

saregamapa+2021+grand+juries.JPG

2439 ms

lilchamps_vote.JPG

lilchamps_vote.JPG

2315 ms

saregamapa+2021+contestants+zee+tv.JPG

saregamapa+2021+contestants+zee+tv.JPG

2422 ms

lil%20champs%20vote%20missed%20call%20nos.JPG

lil%20champs%20vote%20missed%20call%20nos.JPG

2210 ms

top%206%20saregamapa%20lil%20champs%20finalists.JPG

top%206%20saregamapa%20lil%20champs%20finalists.JPG

2450 ms

www.lilchampsvote.in

www.lilchampsvote.in

107 ms

authorization.css

authorization.css

38 ms

font

font

138 ms

authorization.css

authorization.css

52 ms

logo-16.png

logo-16.png

35 ms

back-top.png

back-top.png

2269 ms

lower.png

lower.png

2364 ms

footer-line.png

footer-line.png

2578 ms

all.js

all.js

44 ms

script_v1.js

script_v1.js

284 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

64 ms

all.js

all.js

5 ms

Accessibility Review

lilchampsvote.in accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lilchampsvote.in best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

lilchampsvote.in SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lilchampsvote.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lilchampsvote.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lilchampsvote.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lil Champs Vote. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: