5.5 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.9 sec
276 ms
Visit lile.com now to see the best up-to-date Lile content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lile.com
Discover the best local moving companies in your area, offering reliable, efficient, and affordable services to make your move stress-free.
Visit lile.comWe analyzed Lile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
lile.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value1,560 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.092
91/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
1285 ms
402 ms
224 ms
153 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Lile.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Secure.livechatinc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lile.com.
Page size can be reduced by 855.6 kB (52%)
1.6 MB
790.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lile.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 918.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lile needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 632.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 632.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 97.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lile.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 97.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (45%)
64
35
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lile.com
1285 ms
sugar_grp1.js
402 ms
calendar.js
224 ms
display.css
153 ms
thickbox.css
154 ms
mappress.css
153 ms
style.css
155 ms
addtoany.min.css
156 ms
jquery.js
253 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
230 ms
display.js
230 ms
log.js
215 ms
soliloquy.css
161 ms
style.css
163 ms
core.min.js
164 ms
datepicker.min.js
246 ms
thickbox.js
239 ms
widget.min.js
239 ms
tabs.min.js
246 ms
aimtoggle.js
247 ms
soliloquy-min.js
265 ms
loader.js
10 ms
style.css
88 ms
css
31 ms
impl-1_22.js
3 ms
ga.js
115 ms
tracking.js
116 ms
www.lile.com
1244 ms
mobile-logo.jpg
259 ms
facebook-white.png
99 ms
linkedin-white.png
100 ms
header-logo.jpg
219 ms
header-were-hiring.jpg
219 ms
FREE-Quote.png
314 ms
slider-householdmovstor.jpg
405 ms
slider-officerelo.jpg
358 ms
slider-warehouse-dist.jpg
537 ms
slider-fpo2.jpg
460 ms
slider-fpo3.jpg
496 ms
testimonial-speech-bubble-DEEPER.png
461 ms
footer-badge-wbenc.jpg
511 ms
household-moving1.jpg
518 ms
footer-logo.png
524 ms
footer-badge-northamerican.jpg
612 ms
footer-badge-crst-delivers.jpg
613 ms
footer-badge-promover.jpg
613 ms
northamerican_badge_color.png
613 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM0DauxaEVho0aInXGvhmB4k.ttf
36 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Iue0YgdIF4L_q7PS4yTQOQ.ttf
35 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6EfrksRSinjQUrHtm_nW72g.ttf
38 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Edtd7Dq2ZflsctMEexj2lw.ttf
34 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6DiS5Fc5Bg1xsygf01vWWOU.ttf
33 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
35 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
35 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
35 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
36 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf
35 ms
__utm.gif
40 ms
script_data.js
83 ms
log.php
319 ms
page.js
22 ms
left.png
461 ms
right.png
494 ms
circle.png
508 ms
circle-hover.png
516 ms
pause.png
521 ms
play.png
532 ms
video.png
572 ms
slider-arrows-horizontal.png
586 ms
slider-dots.png
592 ms
collect
72 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
554 ms
localization.en.0.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d_58b84579a2942ea533546d6b504a6ced.js
42 ms
ping
77 ms
open_chat.cgi
62 ms
ga-audiences
45 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
27 ms
livechat-modern_7cf45543dc.ttf
34 ms
embedded.20160318100705.js
108 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
4 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
43 ms
wcm
47 ms
lile.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
lile.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lile.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lile.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: