2.5 sec in total
613 ms
1.5 sec
342 ms
Visit lillightomine.com now to see the best up-to-date Lillightomine content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lillightomine.com
When you feel out of ideas and energy in parenting, I’d love to connect you with resources and encourage you back to life.
Visit lillightomine.comWe analyzed Lillightomine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 613 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
lillightomine.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value3.9 s
83/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.098
90/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
613 ms
94 ms
109 ms
74 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lillightomine.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (672 ms) relates to the external source Courtneydefeo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 292.7 kB (22%)
1.3 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Lillightomine.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 951.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 56.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lillightomine images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 166.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 166.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lillightomine.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (46%)
35
19
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lillightomine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
courtneydefeo.com
613 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
94 ms
style.css
109 ms
styles.css
74 ms
dashicons.min.css
149 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
76 ms
jquery.js
211 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
110 ms
responsive-menu.js
114 ms
parallax.js
129 ms
pinit.js
9 ms
jquery.form.min.js
141 ms
scripts.js
141 ms
wp-gallery-custom-links.js
143 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
607 ms
jquery.localScroll.min.js
605 ms
scroll.js
672 ms
wp-embed.min.js
178 ms
ga.js
9 ms
__utm.gif
103 ms
logo.png
111 ms
twitter.png
71 ms
facebook.png
77 ms
pinterest.png
106 ms
instagram.png
107 ms
rss.png
140 ms
mail.png
144 ms
nav-bg.jpg
182 ms
bg-home.jpg
513 ms
the-book.jpg
284 ms
Screen-Shot-2014-08-28-at-9.33.56-AM-340x230.png
442 ms
llom-the-blog-01.jpg
357 ms
blog-contributors-340x230.jpg
441 ms
store-340x230.jpg
480 ms
8e96d2cf1b17c9a1-340x230.jpg
443 ms
beaconads.js
11 ms
Nexa_Book-webfont.woff
414 ms
pinit_main.js
25 ms
lillightomine.com accessibility score
lillightomine.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
lillightomine.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lillightomine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lillightomine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lillightomine.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lillightomine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: