Tools & Wizards About Us
lillyinstitutes.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

lillyinstitutes.com

Lilly Institutes | Faculty Learning Communities

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

92 ms

Resources Loaded

950 ms

Page Rendered

117 ms

lillyinstitutes.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lillyinstitutes.com now to see the best up-to-date Lilly Institutes content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lillyinstitutes.com

Designing, Implementing, and Facilitating Faculty Learning Communities

Visit lillyinstitutes.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lillyinstitutes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lillyinstitutes.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.09

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lillyinstitutes.com

92 ms

minified.js

108 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

106 ms

polyfill.min.js

194 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lillyinstitutes.com, 40% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 40% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (385 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 538.0 kB (59%)

Content Size

907.5 kB

After Optimization

369.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lillyinstitutes.com main page is 907.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 498.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 393.2 kB

  • Original 498.1 kB
  • After minification 496.3 kB
  • After compression 104.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 393.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 10.5 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lilly Institutes needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 142.5 kB

  • Original 398.9 kB
  • After minification 398.9 kB
  • After compression 256.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 142.5 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lilly Institutes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lillyinstitutes.com

www.lillyinstitutes.com

92 ms

minified.js

minified.js

108 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

106 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

194 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

93 ms

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

177 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

177 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

180 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

175 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

238 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

178 ms

7516e7_f7505dca65004f23af501b75999a6b83~mv2.jpg

7516e7_f7505dca65004f23af501b75999a6b83~mv2.jpg

385 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

93 ms

7516e7_0dffdacf0e3b44db946ab71de3c7cdf6~mv2.png

7516e7_0dffdacf0e3b44db946ab71de3c7cdf6~mv2.png

246 ms

174 ms

172 ms

167 ms

163 ms

155 ms

149 ms

190 ms

187 ms

187 ms

184 ms

182 ms

184 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

11 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

15 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

8 ms

Accessibility Review

lillyinstitutes.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lillyinstitutes.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lillyinstitutes.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lillyinstitutes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lillyinstitutes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lillyinstitutes.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lilly Institutes. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: