Tools & Wizards About Us
lilo.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

lilo.co.uk

Web Development London | Web Design Agency London

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

239 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

178 ms

lilo.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit lilo.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Lilo content for Pakistan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lilo.co.uk

Lilo is an award winning Web Development London Agency. Specialising in Web Development, Web Design, WordPress, Shopify & Magento.

Visit lilo.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Lilo.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Lilo.co.uk rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

lilo.co.uk performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,740 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lilo.co.uk

239 ms

www.lilo.co.uk

397 ms

jquery-min.js

392 ms

GlobalStylesheet.css

316 ms

ProjectSlide.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Lilo.co.uk, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (570 ms) belongs to the original domain Lilo.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 519.8 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

939.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lilo.co.uk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 829.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 53.6 kB

  • Original 64.3 kB
  • After minification 52.3 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.0 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 31.9 kB

  • Original 829.5 kB
  • After minification 797.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lilo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 382.6 kB

  • Original 502.2 kB
  • After minification 375.7 kB
  • After compression 119.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 382.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 51.7 kB

  • Original 63.4 kB
  • After minification 53.9 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lilo.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (55%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lilo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lilo.co.uk

lilo.co.uk

239 ms

www.lilo.co.uk

www.lilo.co.uk

397 ms

jquery-min.js

jquery-min.js

392 ms

GlobalStylesheet.css

GlobalStylesheet.css

316 ms

ProjectSlide.css

ProjectSlide.css

182 ms

jquery.sidr.dark.css

jquery.sidr.dark.css

180 ms

jquery2.js

jquery2.js

559 ms

hideshow.js

hideshow.js

233 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

258 ms

loopedslider-min.js

loopedslider-min.js

259 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

318 ms

jquery.sidr.min.js

jquery.sidr.min.js

338 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

342 ms

jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.7.min.js

jquery.dcjqaccordion.2.7.min.js

403 ms

mySlider.js

mySlider.js

404 ms

BoxSlide.js

BoxSlide.js

426 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

352 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

399 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

404 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

405 ms

initial.js

initial.js

428 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

76 ms

mobile_menu_button.png

mobile_menu_button.png

123 ms

miniComp.jpg

miniComp.jpg

85 ms

pencil.jpg

pencil.jpg

122 ms

cloud.jpg

cloud.jpg

122 ms

showcase.png

showcase.png

254 ms

pinterest128.png

pinterest128.png

122 ms

instagram128.png

instagram128.png

168 ms

linkedin128.png

linkedin128.png

181 ms

googleplus128.png

googleplus128.png

187 ms

twitter128.png

twitter128.png

200 ms

facebook128.png

facebook128.png

204 ms

Lilo.jpg

Lilo.jpg

238 ms

Project-MPC.jpg

Project-MPC.jpg

341 ms

WhiteArrow-Right.png

WhiteArrow-Right.png

221 ms

Project-nota-bene.jpg

Project-nota-bene.jpg

415 ms

Project-Planet.jpg

Project-Planet.jpg

334 ms

Project-Josoblu.jpg

Project-Josoblu.jpg

532 ms

Project-LMAA.jpg

Project-LMAA.jpg

554 ms

Project-British-Council.jpg

Project-British-Council.jpg

405 ms

Project-RICS.jpg

Project-RICS.jpg

494 ms

GreyArrow.png

GreyArrow.png

419 ms

WhiteDot.gif

WhiteDot.gif

482 ms

read-more-blue.jpg

read-more-blue.jpg

473 ms

read-more-grn.jpg

read-more-grn.jpg

490 ms

FooterMap.png

FooterMap.png

551 ms

social-media.png

social-media.png

546 ms

HelveticaNeueLTPro-Bd.woff

HelveticaNeueLTPro-Bd.woff

570 ms

ga.js

ga.js

54 ms

42 ms

Circle-Select.png

Circle-Select.png

522 ms

Circle.png

Circle.png

541 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

98 ms

Accessibility Review

lilo.co.uk accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lilo.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lilo.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lilo.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lilo.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lilo.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lilo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: