11.3 sec in total
1.9 sec
7.4 sec
2.1 sec
Welcome to lilofil.com homepage info - get ready to check LILOFIL best content right away, or after learning these important things about lilofil.com
Looking for a knitting pattern for your skeins of wool? Discover my creations:modern and easy to wear. Download and knit!
Visit lilofil.comWe analyzed Lilofil.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 9.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
lilofil.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value980 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
1864 ms
39 ms
69 ms
55 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Lilofil.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Lilofil.com.
Page size can be reduced by 280.6 kB (5%)
6.2 MB
5.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Lilofil.com main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LILOFIL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (60%)
83
33
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LILOFIL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1864 ms
upe_blocks.css
39 ms
style.min.css
69 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
55 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
55 ms
style.css
160 ms
kt-social.css
72 ms
kadence-woocommerce-elementor-pro.css
70 ms
kadence-woocommerce-elementor.css
73 ms
style-blocks-rowlayout.css
74 ms
style-blocks-column.css
82 ms
style-blocks-spacer.css
80 ms
style-blocks-advancedbtn.css
83 ms
kb-button-deprecated-style.min.css
83 ms
style-blocks-infobox.css
173 ms
style-blocks-portfoliogrid.css
95 ms
ksp.css
96 ms
virtue.css
112 ms
virtue-woocommerce.css
98 ms
virtue_icons.css
110 ms
default.css
109 ms
css
61 ms
jquery.min.js
121 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
123 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
123 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
124 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
135 ms
js.cookie.min.js
137 ms
woocommerce.min.js
137 ms
js
89 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
224 ms
wc-blocks.css
147 ms
kadence-splide.min.css
145 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
146 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
160 ms
order-attribution.min.js
159 ms
api.js
52 ms
kt-social-min.js
194 ms
bootstrap-min.js
215 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
216 ms
plugins-min.js
196 ms
kt-sticky-min.js
264 ms
magnific-popup-min.js
177 ms
virtue_lightbox-min.js
163 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
162 ms
masonry.min.js
248 ms
main-min.js
161 ms
kt-add-to-cart-variation-min.js
160 ms
splide.min.js
168 ms
kb-splide-init.min.js
168 ms
fbevents.js
124 ms
logo_lileauxfils-min.jpg
112 ms
logo_lileauxfils-mobile-min.jpg
112 ms
menu-mod%C3%A8les-1200x800-min.jpg
464 ms
Udara-1-1024x857.png
163 ms
Gylden-4-1-1024x1024.jpg
161 ms
Salouen-5-ok-1024x1024.jpg
114 ms
IG-3-1024x1024.jpg
198 ms
Louize-7-1024x1024.jpg
197 ms
Osmanthe-3-1024x1024.png
200 ms
Pull-pins-enfant-1024x1024.jpg
164 ms
rav-lusen-3-1024x1024.jpg
166 ms
Sagay-3-taille-550-rotated.jpg
166 ms
Image1-1024x1024.jpg
202 ms
mod%C3%A8le-tricot-Lopta-3-min.jpg
203 ms
oxalis.jpg
215 ms
iberis.jpg
203 ms
olmo.jpg
204 ms
logo1.jpg
205 ms
lilofil.webp
205 ms
logo-cookieyes.svg
280 ms
sbi-sprite.png
105 ms
virtue_icons.ttf
162 ms
recaptcha__fr.js
109 ms
admin-ajax.php
2881 ms
placeholder.png
101 ms
458295438_18458941321004224_8574386197368825078_nfull.webp
133 ms
455695933_18455439355004224_6257520028266348961_nfull.webp
132 ms
455240787_18454932274004224_5719904692526171796_nfull.webp
125 ms
455023604_18454543129004224_1609952985872003088_nfull.webp
128 ms
455240787_18454932274004224_5719904692526171796_nfull.webp
127 ms
455023604_18454543129004224_1609952985872003088_nfull.webp
98 ms
455695933_18455439355004224_6257520028266348961_nfull.webp
102 ms
458295438_18458941321004224_8574386197368825078_nfull.webp
96 ms
virtue_print.css
117 ms
lilofil.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
lilofil.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lilofil.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lilofil.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lilofil.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lilofil.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LILOFIL. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: