6.2 sec in total
1.8 sec
4.1 sec
314 ms
Click here to check amazing Limefresh Design content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about limefreshdesign.co.uk
We develop websites to match your companies look. We are based in Cheshire. All our sites are made to work and look correctly on a computer phone or tablet.
Visit limefreshdesign.co.ukWe analyzed Limefreshdesign.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
limefreshdesign.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
1770 ms
257 ms
19 ms
768 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Limefreshdesign.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Limefreshdesign.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 794.6 kB (36%)
2.2 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Limefreshdesign.co.uk main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Limefresh Design images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 378.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 378.1 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 333.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Limefreshdesign.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 333.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (46%)
63
34
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Limefresh Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
limefreshdesign.co.uk
1770 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
257 ms
jquery-ui.css
19 ms
style.css
768 ms
css
34 ms
style.min.css
383 ms
styles.css
259 ms
front.min.css
259 ms
front.min.css
258 ms
jquery.js
384 ms
modernizr.js
428 ms
iframe_api
47 ms
front.min.js
343 ms
core.min.js
260 ms
widget.min.js
345 ms
tabs.min.js
345 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
384 ms
flexslider.js
385 ms
plugins_stack.js
428 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
599 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
429 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
469 ms
main.js
651 ms
portfolio-grid.js
513 ms
scripts.js
514 ms
front.min.js
554 ms
wp-embed.min.js
598 ms
frontend_testimonials.js
599 ms
css
15 ms
www-widgetapi.js
67 ms
Lime-Fresh-web-Design-Macclesfield.jpg
280 ms
icons-s9d70e4ef52.png
272 ms
slider_pattern.png
271 ms
slide1.jpg
549 ms
slide2-bw.jpg
369 ms
slide3-bw1.jpg
548 ms
forest6-350x270.jpg
368 ms
forest-featured-700x540.jpg
549 ms
forest2-350x540.jpg
367 ms
home-700x540.jpg
549 ms
learn-zone-350x540.jpg
550 ms
shop1-350x270.jpg
550 ms
Logo.jpg
551 ms
kart-4-cash-Logo.jpg
550 ms
Shop-350x270.jpg
551 ms
Account-page-350x270.jpg
552 ms
Home-Screen-700x375.jpg
666 ms
logo-1.png
551 ms
logo-9.png
665 ms
logo-3.png
665 ms
logo-4.png
665 ms
logo-5.png
667 ms
logo-6.png
666 ms
logo-8.png
699 ms
logo-7.png
699 ms
logo-12.png
699 ms
logo-10.png
701 ms
bebasneue-webfont.svg
651 ms
bebasneue-webfont.woff
650 ms
font
217 ms
font
40 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
734 ms
font
217 ms
oswald-regular-webfont.svg
817 ms
oswald-regular-webfont.woff
733 ms
analytics.js
262 ms
collect
155 ms
js
63 ms
limefreshdesign.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
limefreshdesign.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
limefreshdesign.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Limefreshdesign.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Limefreshdesign.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
limefreshdesign.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Limefresh Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: