Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

limitscale.com

A digital agency | Limitscale Digital

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

35 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

580 ms

limitscale.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to limitscale.com homepage info - get ready to check Limitscale best content right away, or after learning these important things about limitscale.com

Limitscale digital commerce services - strategy, design, technology, contents and digital marketing – go digital to lead.

Visit limitscale.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Limitscale.com page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

limitscale.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,400 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

limitscale.com

35 ms

limitscale.io

1306 ms

e981f.css

505 ms

icon

32 ms

76d40.css

704 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Limitscale.com, 61% (35 requests) were made to Limitscale.io and 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Limitscale.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 217.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Limitscale.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 161.8 kB

  • Original 198.7 kB
  • After minification 194.3 kB
  • After compression 36.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 161.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Limitscale images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 21.0 kB

  • Original 801.0 kB
  • After minification 801.0 kB
  • After compression 780.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 179.4 kB
  • After minification 179.4 kB
  • After compression 176.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Limitscale.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (65%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Limitscale. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

limitscale.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

limitscale.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

limitscale.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Limitscale.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Limitscale.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Limitscale. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: