3.8 sec in total
960 ms
2.8 sec
102 ms
Click here to check amazing Lindsay Wright content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lindsaywright.net
Visit lindsaywright.netWe analyzed Lindsaywright.net page load time and found that the first response time was 960 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lindsaywright.net performance score
960 ms
162 ms
381 ms
188 ms
176 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Lindsaywright.net, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Dictionarybox.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (960 ms) belongs to the original domain Lindsaywright.net.
Page size can be reduced by 663.1 kB (78%)
848.4 kB
185.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Lindsaywright.net main page is 848.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 536.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lindsay Wright needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 215.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 215.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 427.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lindsaywright.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 427.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (79%)
38
8
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lindsay Wright. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lindsaywright.net
960 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
162 ms
32f7560b_ai1ec_parsed_css.css
381 ms
dictionary-box-style.css
188 ms
pagination.css
176 ms
sc_our_team.css
181 ms
style.css
172 ms
bootstrap.css
226 ms
font-awesome.min.css
249 ms
style.css
241 ms
css
25 ms
red.css
251 ms
camera.css
253 ms
owl.carousel.css
301 ms
owl.transitions.css
318 ms
animate.css
394 ms
jquery.min.js
7 ms
dictionary-box-funcs.js
416 ms
hc.js
334 ms
carousel.js
391 ms
sc_our_team.js
417 ms
core.min.js
465 ms
masonry.min.js
451 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
476 ms
script.js
476 ms
navigation.js
463 ms
bootstrap.js
546 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
529 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
544 ms
camera.js
557 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
554 ms
jquery.stickyNavbar.min.js
553 ms
wp-embed.min.js
590 ms
English.png
221 ms
French.png
221 ms
stardust.png
217 ms
cat_logo.png
217 ms
C6HYlRF50SGJq1XyXj04zwV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf
8 ms
xgzbb53t8j-Mo-vYa23n5onF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
23 ms
C6HYlRF50SGJq1XyXj04z1FZMcfX2SbzQ69I7OWmkGo.ttf
22 ms
C6HYlRF50SGJq1XyXj04z306qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
318 ms
up.png
190 ms
lindsaywright.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lindsaywright.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lindsaywright.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lindsaywright.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lindsay Wright. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: