4 sec in total
343 ms
2.7 sec
922 ms
Click here to check amazing Lindum content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lindum.no
Gjennom 25 år har Lindum kontinuerlig søkt etter – og tatt i bruk – innovative løsninger for å utnytte ressursene som finnes i avfall.
Visit lindum.noWe analyzed Lindum.no page load time and found that the first response time was 343 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lindum.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
343 ms
584 ms
108 ms
216 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Lindum.no, 33% (13 requests) were made to Clairs.no and 3% (1 request) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Clairs.no.
Page size can be reduced by 186.7 kB (37%)
506.7 kB
319.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Lindum.no main page is 506.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 202.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 157.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lindum needs image optimization as it can save up to 157.8 kB or 78% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lindum.no has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (31%)
29
20
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lindum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lindum.no
343 ms
lindum.no
584 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
108 ms
app.min.css
216 ms
uc.js
31 ms
js.min.js
880 ms
foundation.css
109 ms
motion-ui.css
259 ms
brands.min.css
216 ms
light.min.css
332 ms
regular.min.css
332 ms
solid.min.css
333 ms
duotone.min.css
326 ms
fontawesome.min.css
472 ms
Lindum-knuse-betong_1.webp
709 ms
Lindum-knuse-betong_1.webp
1070 ms
tre-B.png
533 ms
mat-1-B.png
533 ms
forurensede-masser-B.png
533 ms
nese-B.png
533 ms
containerbil-B.png
662 ms
Den-Magiske-Fabrikken-Lindum-mars.webp
754 ms
Lindum-forsker-kvinne-laboratorium-arbeid.webp
755 ms
Knuseverk_7-1.webp
853 ms
Deponiutvidelse-Nordjordet_31.webp
853 ms
shutterstock_747863380-1.webp
806 ms
8.webp
960 ms
lindum-logo.svg
158 ms
hero-home-banner-overlay.png
429 ms
logo-elem-bg.svg
160 ms
lindum-logo-inv.svg
159 ms
TTCommonsProBold.woff
324 ms
TTCommonsProDemiBold.woff
220 ms
TTCommonsProMedium.woff
435 ms
TTCommonsProRegular.woff
445 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
550 ms
fa-light-300.woff
444 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
498 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
539 ms
lindum.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lindum.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lindum.no SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NO
NB
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lindum.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lindum.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lindum.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lindum. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: