Tools & Wizards About Us
linedoball.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

linedoball.com

ดูบอลสด 666 คืนนี้ ดูฟุตบอลวันนี้ 88 dooball ออนไลน์

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

563 ms

linedoball.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to linedoball.com homepage info - get ready to check Linedoball best content for Thailand right away, or after learning these important things about linedoball.com

เว็บไซต์ดูบอลสด 666 ดูบอลออนไลน์ 88 ดูบอลผ่านมือถือภาพคมชัดระดับคุณภาพ ลิ้งค์ Dooball 77 ครบทุกลีกผ่านเน็ตฟรี

Visit linedoball.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Linedoball.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

linedoball.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.191

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

linedoball.com

59 ms

www.linedoball.com

1264 ms

style.min.css

24 ms

styles.css

50 ms

font-awesome.min.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Linedoball.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Linedoball.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 202.2 kB (28%)

Content Size

716.8 kB

After Optimization

514.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Linedoball.com main page is 716.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 257.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 99.4 kB

  • Original 116.6 kB
  • After minification 104.7 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 316 B

  • Original 257.3 kB
  • After minification 257.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Linedoball images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 576 B

  • Original 163.9 kB
  • After minification 163.9 kB
  • After compression 163.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 102.0 kB

  • Original 179.0 kB
  • After minification 77.8 kB
  • After compression 77.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Linedoball.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102.0 kB or 57% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (61%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linedoball. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

linedoball.com

linedoball.com

59 ms

www.linedoball.com

www.linedoball.com

1264 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

24 ms

styles.css

styles.css

50 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

36 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

38 ms

bootstrap.min.css.map

bootstrap.min.css.map

661 ms

custom.css

custom.css

51 ms

fl-icons.css

fl-icons.css

50 ms

pum-site-styles.css

pum-site-styles.css

62 ms

flatsome.css

flatsome.css

51 ms

style.css

style.css

63 ms

css

css

61 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

64 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

65 ms

popper.js

popper.js

63 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

64 ms

js

js

83 ms

js

js

127 ms

index.js

index.js

67 ms

index.js

index.js

73 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

63 ms

flatsome-live-search.js

flatsome-live-search.js

68 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

72 ms

pum-site-scripts.js

pum-site-scripts.js

79 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

84 ms

flatsome.js

flatsome.js

78 ms

flatsome-lazy-load.js

flatsome-lazy-load.js

82 ms

css

css

19 ms

linedoball-1.png

linedoball-1.png

197 ms

headersa-scaled-1.jpg

headersa-scaled-1.jpg

199 ms

headersatital.jpg

headersatital.jpg

938 ms

linedoball-1.jpg

linedoball-1.jpg

197 ms

linedoball-2.jpg

linedoball-2.jpg

195 ms

linedoball-3.jpg

linedoball-3.jpg

196 ms

linedoball-4.jpg

linedoball-4.jpg

200 ms

linedoball-5.jpg

linedoball-5.jpg

199 ms

linedoball.com_.png

linedoball.com_.png

200 ms

photo_2022-10-19_16-42-19.jpg

photo_2022-10-19_16-42-19.jpg

200 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

177 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

178 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

357 ms

fl-icons.ttf

fl-icons.ttf

1336 ms

header22.png

header22.png

299 ms

face3.png

face3.png

12 ms

line2.png

line2.png

9 ms

refect2.png

refect2.png

18 ms

download.png

download.png

23 ms

Accessibility Review

linedoball.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

linedoball.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

linedoball.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Linedoball.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Thai is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Linedoball.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

linedoball.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Linedoball. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: