Access linemark.com. What We Do | Custom Printing and Communications Solutions

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,410 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

www.linemark.com

576 ms

113f403dc34ed4e29b80e1f73d634d29.css

54 ms

4ab2787654446a36232d064d937f11cf.css

107 ms

4f30e0086d1a8d0fe1e153252028520c.css

162 ms

21f72c535eaa98ac083fc146f2d8578d.css

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Linemark.com, 24% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (576 ms) belongs to the original domain Linemark.com.

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Linemark.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 101.0 kB

Original 126.2 kB
After minification 122.9 kB
After compression 25.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

Original 1.8 MB
After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Linemark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 324.2 kB

Original 916.0 kB
After minification 916.0 kB
After compression 591.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 324.2 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 529 B

Original 123.3 kB
After minification 123.3 kB
After compression 122.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Linemark.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linemark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Linemark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Linemark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

linemark.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Linemark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

What We Do | Custom Printing and Communications Solutions | Linemark

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

www.linemark.com

113f403dc34ed4e29b80e1f73d634d29.css

4ab2787654446a36232d064d937f11cf.css

4f30e0086d1a8d0fe1e153252028520c.css

21f72c535eaa98ac083fc146f2d8578d.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

www.linemark.com

113f403dc34ed4e29b80e1f73d634d29.css

4ab2787654446a36232d064d937f11cf.css

4f30e0086d1a8d0fe1e153252028520c.css

21f72c535eaa98ac083fc146f2d8578d.css

a3d7a722a571ddca2d8b5ab502c23425.css

e28a1cf75f900f0430873354af4fac77.css

1f4699a5f7e79fed62eab5f5840af863.css

0a1d470dd0d6b73f40e61215562aba71.css

cd9ca98acdd15878d1da4d47e5ba1594.css

cbb685da6dd20309bd3ee12dd4ec066e.css

ab803009a16b3e05e42c3aa0e509d54c.css

58b86a4070844babed666f4878dbcaa7.css

75c684bd68bc4378a6a9703a81546750.css

333d24c5a53b0d12c18e9b47045cf69f.css

15e8c6e1e48dca0a762de213bc2f27d1.css

e544cc27ad2d996fdf0e12137d733af8.css

e6a15d47fc55243cd269d2d8fb98f167.css

707f88bf7b91cb531ccabc13b6cc476a.css

89f4fdf4facf5f5b2ff84698753584cb.css

0b3b0b430c317768f0d9872472abedb6.css

8206c14068ceb04746eccc12ce6271b1.css

jquery.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

js

adsbygoogle.js

d980314985d7c17708ee4a6fa1a8ba83.css

elementor.js

index.js

index.js

slick.js

slick.min.js

custom.js

functions.js

scripts.js

api.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

index.js

ivory-search.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js