2.6 sec in total
237 ms
2.1 sec
213 ms
Visit link-ink.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Link Ink content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about link-ink.co.uk
Visit link-ink.co.ukWe analyzed Link-ink.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 237 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
link-ink.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.785
5/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
237 ms
438 ms
54 ms
71 ms
75 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Link-ink.co.uk, 21% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 20% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.shopwired.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (539 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.shopwired.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 124.1 kB (16%)
765.0 kB
640.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Link-ink.co.uk main page is 765.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 508.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 56.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Link Ink needs image optimization as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 23.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Link-ink.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (63%)
38
14
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Link Ink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
link-ink.co.uk
237 ms
www.link-ink.co.uk
438 ms
foundation.min.css
54 ms
slick.css
71 ms
slick-theme.min.css
75 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
52 ms
froala_style.css
78 ms
css
46 ms
theme.css
36 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
75 ms
jquery.cookie@1.4.1
122 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
63 ms
jquery.unveil.min.js
75 ms
plugins.min.js
382 ms
application.js
38 ms
default
301 ms
logo.jpg
377 ms
loading.gif
32 ms
card_paypal.png
301 ms
card_mastercard.png
415 ms
card_visa.png
433 ms
card_maestro.png
433 ms
gateway_paypal_gateway.png
433 ms
banner-reward-points.png
98 ms
banner-frontlit-banner.png
99 ms
banner-full-easy-inks-range.png
532 ms
banner-banner-accessories2.png
114 ms
aktiv_grotesk_400_normal.woff
88 ms
aktiv_grotesk_500_normal.woff
72 ms
aktiv_grotesk300_normal.woff
381 ms
aktiv_grotesk_700_normal.woff
380 ms
sw-icons.svg
21 ms
sw-icons.ttf
20 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
87 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
88 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
123 ms
aktiv_grotesk_700_italic.woff
303 ms
aktiv_grotesk_500_italic.woff
32 ms
aktiv_grotesk_400_italic.woff
64 ms
aktiv_grotesk_300_italic.woff
88 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
141 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
143 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
142 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
143 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
141 ms
aktiv_grotesk300_normal.ttf
295 ms
aktiv_grotesk_700_normal.ttf
22 ms
aktiv_grotesk_700_italic.ttf
539 ms
aktiv_grotesk300_normal.svg
296 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
160 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
72 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
78 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
161 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
179 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
176 ms
twk-main.js
84 ms
twk-vendor.js
91 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
114 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
107 ms
twk-runtime.js
126 ms
twk-app.js
122 ms
link-ink.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
link-ink.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
link-ink.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Link-ink.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Link-ink.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
link-ink.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Link Ink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: