6.7 sec in total
179 ms
2.9 sec
3.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Linked In Jetpack content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about linkedinjetpack.com
At your service since 2016 Providing the best quality LinkedIn services on the market! Learn more Thousands of job seekers and entrepreneurs – just like you…
Visit linkedinjetpack.comWe analyzed Linkedinjetpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
linkedinjetpack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value4,710 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
179 ms
136 ms
752 ms
77 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Linkedinjetpack.com, 92% (34 requests) were made to Linkedjetpack.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (752 ms) relates to the external source Linkedjetpack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 125.8 kB (52%)
242.6 kB
116.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Linkedinjetpack.com main page is 242.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 145.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 122.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Linked In Jetpack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Linkedinjetpack.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (82%)
34
6
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linked In Jetpack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
linkedinjetpack.com
179 ms
linkedjetpack.com
136 ms
www.linkedjetpack.com
752 ms
css
77 ms
style.min.css
69 ms
styles.css
136 ms
public.min.css
170 ms
wp-show-posts-min.css
172 ms
lazyload-shared.css
181 ms
style.css
198 ms
widget-areas.min.css
197 ms
main.min.css
192 ms
style.css
217 ms
style-816.css
223 ms
offside.min.css
222 ms
navigation-branding-flex.min.css
239 ms
jquery.min.js
300 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
242 ms
redirect_method.js
265 ms
sticky.min.js
264 ms
offside.min.js
271 ms
lazysizes.min.js
292 ms
index.js
427 ms
index.js
552 ms
lazyload-shared.js
564 ms
lazyload-youtube.js
567 ms
lazyload-vimeo.js
568 ms
reviews.js
569 ms
menu.min.js
569 ms
back-to-top.min.js
570 ms
jquery.matchHeight.js
555 ms
public.min.js
556 ms
vector_triangles_left.svg
290 ms
vector_triangles_right.svg
286 ms
gtm.js
428 ms
play-y-red.png
330 ms
cropped-logo-350x70-text.png
71 ms
linkedinjetpack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
linkedinjetpack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
linkedinjetpack.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Linkedinjetpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Linkedinjetpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
linkedinjetpack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Linked In Jetpack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: