2.1 sec in total
444 ms
1.5 sec
190 ms
Welcome to linksofchoice.com homepage info - get ready to check Linksofchoice best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about linksofchoice.com
Have your URL submitted to our quality directory and benefit from increased traffic and links to your website. We manually review and list all websites under relevant headings and ensure only worthy w...
Visit linksofchoice.comWe analyzed Linksofchoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 444 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
linksofchoice.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value670 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
444 ms
69 ms
75 ms
151 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Linksofchoice.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (559 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 184.3 kB (67%)
275.7 kB
91.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Linksofchoice.com main page is 275.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 166.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Linksofchoice needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 118.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Linksofchoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (66%)
74
25
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linksofchoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
linksofchoice.com
444 ms
style.css
69 ms
style.css
75 ms
jquery.js
151 ms
sessvars.js
71 ms
intelli.js
76 ms
intelli.resize.js
80 ms
intelli.config.js
135 ms
intelli.lang.en.js
139 ms
style.css
108 ms
all.js
269 ms
widgets.js
6 ms
index.js
87 ms
js
24 ms
google_map.js
92 ms
count-click.js
120 ms
index.js
122 ms
intelli.minmax.js
142 ms
intelli.thumbs.js
145 ms
intelli.search.js
148 ms
intelli.common.js
153 ms
footer.js
156 ms
contacts.js
157 ms
body-top-bg.png
40 ms
outer-page-bg.png
48 ms
page_setup.gif
51 ms
header-bg.png
58 ms
header-left-bg.png
61 ms
header-right-bg.png
63 ms
fb.gif
95 ms
img_68b77dc326.png
95 ms
top-menu-bg.png
95 ms
search-left.png
96 ms
search-right.png
97 ms
search-bg.png
98 ms
search-button-bg.png
146 ms
content-top-left.png
148 ms
content-top-right.png
147 ms
content-left-bg.png
148 ms
right-column-top.png
148 ms
left-column-bg.png
148 ms
box-caption-bg.png
168 ms
sp.gif
168 ms
pr10.gif
168 ms
content-mid-left.png
172 ms
category_icon.gif
171 ms
ajax-loader.gif
173 ms
spinner.gif
203 ms
cron.php
345 ms
124 ms
xd_arbiter.php
224 ms
xd_arbiter.php
428 ms
plusone.js
119 ms
right-column-bg.png
39 ms
content-mid-right.png
42 ms
footer-bg.png
43 ms
footer-left.png
43 ms
footer-right.png
80 ms
thumb-bg.gif
79 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
19 ms
minmax.gif
55 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
18 ms
like.php
76 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
25 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
55 ms
fastbutton
107 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
495 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
559 ms
postmessageRelay
38 ms
jot
114 ms
api.js
50 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
88 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
60 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
39 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
39 ms
linksofchoice.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
linksofchoice.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
linksofchoice.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Linksofchoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Linksofchoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
linksofchoice.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Linksofchoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: