Tools & Wizards About Us
lioncage.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

lioncage.com

Digital business solutions, data centers, asset lifecycle management, shredding & records management | Iron Mountain United States

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

157 ms

Resources Loaded

984 ms

Page Rendered

604 ms

lioncage.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lioncage content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lioncage.com

No matter what your information management needs are, we’ve got you covered. Staffed with trained and vetted professionals, our Iron Mountain team is on a mission to help you protect, unlock, and exte...

Visit lioncage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lioncage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 157 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lioncage.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,640 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ironmountain.com

157 ms

utm-set.js

86 ms

gtm.js

85 ms

acba27d699da6a70.css

113 ms

c7e4a9219641d32d.css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lioncage.com, 40% (23 requests) were made to Ironmountain.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (463 ms) relates to the external source Edge.sitecorecloud.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 863.2 kB (31%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Lioncage.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 257.0 kB

  • Original 316.7 kB
  • After minification 316.6 kB
  • After compression 59.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 257.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 606.2 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lioncage needs image optimization as it can save up to 606.2 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (32%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lioncage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ironmountain.com

www.ironmountain.com

157 ms

utm-set.js

utm-set.js

86 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

85 ms

acba27d699da6a70.css

acba27d699da6a70.css

113 ms

c7e4a9219641d32d.css

c7e4a9219641d32d.css

37 ms

671f9f32de05ef58.css

671f9f32de05ef58.css

64 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

82 ms

webpack-dfc3cf69573ae73e.js

webpack-dfc3cf69573ae73e.js

50 ms

framework-2e37a0872d822132.js

framework-2e37a0872d822132.js

167 ms

main-b8037a813ac4b414.js

main-b8037a813ac4b414.js

110 ms

_app-ba436fa6781a8899.js

_app-ba436fa6781a8899.js

180 ms

7d0bf13e-e1d451f3ac7de5ce.js

7d0bf13e-e1d451f3ac7de5ce.js

173 ms

803-1146089be21d2135.js

803-1146089be21d2135.js

184 ms

740-79ac21e2eb53ac88.js

740-79ac21e2eb53ac88.js

190 ms

%5B%5B...path%5D%5D-64a7cfca3486a996.js

%5B%5B...path%5D%5D-64a7cfca3486a996.js

178 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

178 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

189 ms

persona_gradient-yellow-man.jpg

persona_gradient-yellow-man.jpg

213 ms

double-caret-blue.9b8d4a78.svg

double-caret-blue.9b8d4a78.svg

71 ms

ellipse.cdaee4e1.svg

ellipse.cdaee4e1.svg

63 ms

lock.ca64e869.svg

lock.ca64e869.svg

59 ms

double-caret-active.7d3a68cb.svg

double-caret-active.7d3a68cb.svg

57 ms

mountains-blue.svg

mountains-blue.svg

106 ms

double-caret-grey.ed8e6826.svg

double-caret-grey.ed8e6826.svg

60 ms

caret-down-white.eaaea0a5.svg

caret-down-white.eaaea0a5.svg

80 ms

iron-mountain-transforms-the-information-experience-with-new-digital-experience-platform.jpg

iron-mountain-transforms-the-information-experience-with-new-digital-experience-platform.jpg

137 ms

a-man-holding-a-holographic-document.jpg

a-man-holding-a-holographic-document.jpg

137 ms

digital-bridge.jpg

digital-bridge.jpg

152 ms

digital-abstract-concept.jpg

digital-abstract-concept.jpg

125 ms

analyzing-server.jpg

analyzing-server.jpg

171 ms

binary-numbers.jpg

binary-numbers.jpg

230 ms

digital-cloud-nodes.jpg

digital-cloud-nodes.jpg

285 ms

digital-tablet.jpg

digital-tablet.jpg

286 ms

countries_none.svg

countries_none.svg

242 ms

persona-businesswoman.png

persona-businesswoman.png

282 ms

canal-plus.png

canal-plus.png

284 ms

recording-academy_grammy-museum.png

recording-academy_grammy-museum.png

308 ms

akamai.svg

akamai.svg

316 ms

oracle.png

oracle.png

304 ms

the-coca-cola-company.svg

the-coca-cola-company.svg

338 ms

garanti-bbva.svg

garanti-bbva.svg

346 ms

sanofi.svg

sanofi.svg

329 ms

boeing.png

boeing.png

358 ms

bae-systems.png

bae-systems.png

364 ms

hopital-prive-de-lestuaire-medical-professionals-looking-at-screens.jpg

hopital-prive-de-lestuaire-medical-professionals-looking-at-screens.jpg

420 ms

paper-may-be-putting-you-at-risk-go-paperless-thumb.png

paper-may-be-putting-you-at-risk-go-paperless-thumb.png

438 ms

data-centers-akamai.png

data-centers-akamai.png

385 ms

paper-pen.svg

paper-pen.svg

420 ms

laptop-profile-screen.svg

laptop-profile-screen.svg

421 ms

customer-service.svg

customer-service.svg

431 ms

ringing-telephone.svg

ringing-telephone.svg

439 ms

im-logo-lockup-v-reverse.svg

im-logo-lockup-v-reverse.svg

456 ms

im_logo_lockup_h_reverse.svg

im_logo_lockup_h_reverse.svg

450 ms

icon-facebook.svg

icon-facebook.svg

444 ms

icon-linkedin.svg

icon-linkedin.svg

454 ms

icon-youtube.svg

icon-youtube.svg

463 ms

icon-twitter-x.svg

icon-twitter-x.svg

463 ms

Accessibility Review

lioncage.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

lioncage.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lioncage.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lioncage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lioncage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lioncage.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lioncage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: