5 sec in total
143 ms
4.6 sec
290 ms
Click here to check amazing Liquid Ap content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about liquidap.com
Since 1974, our team has worked with companies, banks, courts, and consulting firms to unlock asset value across North America. We partner with clients to tailor a recovery plan for their needs using ...
Visit liquidap.comWe analyzed Liquidap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
liquidap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
1/100
10%
Value72.1 s
0/100
25%
Value26.6 s
0/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value36.2 s
0/100
10%
143 ms
25 ms
99 ms
68 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Liquidap.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (609 ms) relates to the external source Stats.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (48%)
5.2 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Liquidap.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 137.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liquid Ap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 706.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 706.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liquidap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (68%)
85
27
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liquid Ap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.liquidap.com
143 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
25 ms
dashicons.min.css
99 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
68 ms
style.css
101 ms
css
30 ms
styles.css
45 ms
css
38 ms
css3_grid_style.css
46 ms
css3_grid_style.css
66 ms
responsive.css
92 ms
settings.css
127 ms
load-posts.css
125 ms
css
40 ms
js_composer.min.css
166 ms
skeleton.css
129 ms
camera.css
133 ms
skin.css
136 ms
flexslider.css
141 ms
blog.css
142 ms
prettyPhoto.css
145 ms
font-awesome.min.css
149 ms
retina.css
152 ms
animate.css
155 ms
component.css
158 ms
editor-style.css
159 ms
jquery.js
211 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
209 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
216 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
209 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
208 ms
blog.js
209 ms
cforms2012.css
210 ms
cforms.js
210 ms
css
28 ms
core.min.js
208 ms
widget.min.js
209 ms
mouse.min.js
208 ms
resizable.min.js
209 ms
draggable.min.js
209 ms
1932756.js
107 ms
button.min.js
209 ms
position.min.js
205 ms
dialog.min.js
186 ms
wpdialog.min.js
166 ms
comment-reply.min.js
147 ms
jquery.form.min.js
138 ms
scripts.js
136 ms
jQuerytools.js
108 ms
utils.js
114 ms
waypoints.min.js
103 ms
animated-contents.js
100 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
97 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
92 ms
smartbox.js
93 ms
wp-embed.min.js
87 ms
jquery.tweet.js
86 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
83 ms
shortcodes.css
75 ms
calendar.css
20 ms
sprite.png
82 ms
14030162691392173109Main-Logo-w_slogan-retina.png
84 ms
14079476361392173109Main-Logo-w_slogan-retina2.png
28 ms
banner1.jpg
140 ms
banner2.jpg
139 ms
banner3.jpg
170 ms
EBRLogo3.jpg
81 ms
DixieDIST.jpg
83 ms
FeatureImage.jpg
83 ms
SupermarketLiquidation.jpg
83 ms
pastclient3.jpg
131 ms
pastclients1.jpg
133 ms
pastclients2.jpg
131 ms
pastclients4.jpg
162 ms
youtube-channel-button.jpg
133 ms
ajx_loading.gif
136 ms
header-shadow.png
140 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
122 ms
full-image-section4.jpg
88 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
118 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
121 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
119 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
23 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
24 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
22 ms
collect
44 ms
collect
37 ms
collect
609 ms
__ptq.gif
322 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
186 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
189 ms
ajax-loader.gif
61 ms
loading.gif
60 ms
revicons.woff
41 ms
liquidap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
liquidap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
liquidap.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liquidap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liquidap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liquidap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liquid Ap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: