9.9 sec in total
213 ms
9.2 sec
475 ms
Welcome to liquidlitigation.com homepage info - get ready to check Liquidlitigation best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about liquidlitigation.com
We unify the legal process by combining legal holds, case strategy, matter and budget management, review and analytics in a single, web-based platform.
Visit liquidlitigation.comWe analyzed Liquidlitigation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
liquidlitigation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value22.8 s
0/100
10%
Value19,530 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.126
83/100
15%
Value28.5 s
0/100
10%
213 ms
275 ms
200 ms
270 ms
188 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Liquidlitigation.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Liquidlitigation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 149.6 kB (8%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Liquidlitigation.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liquidlitigation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liquidlitigation.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (72%)
78
22
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liquidlitigation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
liquidlitigation.com
213 ms
www.liquidlitigation.com
275 ms
js
200 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
270 ms
style.min.css
188 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
430 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
426 ms
wordpress-svg-icon-plugin-style.min.css
430 ms
bootstrap.min.css
443 ms
font-awesome.min.css
247 ms
plugins.css
251 ms
style.css
483 ms
responsive.css
465 ms
style.css
458 ms
subscribe-forms.css
459 ms
click-to-tweet.css
462 ms
easy-social-share-buttons.css
532 ms
style.css
551 ms
themes.css
553 ms
default.min.css
555 ms
js_composer.min.css
566 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
544 ms
jquery.min.js
564 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
608 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
544 ms
cookie-law-info-ccpa.js
562 ms
home.css
660 ms
css.php
606 ms
home.js
658 ms
v4-shims.min.css
657 ms
all.min.css
656 ms
js_composer_tta.min.css
668 ms
lightbox.min.css
657 ms
owl.min.css
1022 ms
animate.min.css
672 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1024 ms
scripts.js
672 ms
plugins.js
727 ms
pinterest-pro.js
722 ms
subscribe-forms.js
498 ms
essb-core.js
494 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
773 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
623 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
613 ms
vc-tabs.min.js
609 ms
lightbox.min.js
599 ms
jquery.twbsPagination.min.js
585 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
588 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
586 ms
underscore.min.js
577 ms
css
249 ms
css
257 ms
css
265 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
524 ms
vc_grid.min.js
499 ms
analytics.js
150 ms
munchkin.js
366 ms
logo2.png
358 ms
connected.png
357 ms
insighful.png
358 ms
scalable.png
357 ms
cost.png
358 ms
benefits.png
315 ms
admin-ajax.php
6114 ms
index-hero.png
103 ms
tab-bg.png
94 ms
testimonial-arrows.png
95 ms
prev.png
93 ms
next.png
93 ms
loading.gif
99 ms
close.png
97 ms
collect
82 ms
munchkin.js
77 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
404 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
395 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
391 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
391 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
390 ms
proximanova-bold-webfont.woff
120 ms
proximanova-regular-webfont.woff
352 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
384 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
350 ms
wp-svg-plugin-icon-set1.woff
384 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
756 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
759 ms
visitWebPage
711 ms
wpe-common.css
96 ms
2020-Best-of-Banner.jpg
127 ms
iStock-807378706.jpg
145 ms
iStock-622184706.jpg
126 ms
mobilenav.css
35 ms
2020-Best-of-Banner.jpg
39 ms
iStock-622184706.jpg
119 ms
liquidlitigation.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
liquidlitigation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
liquidlitigation.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liquidlitigation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liquidlitigation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liquidlitigation.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Liquidlitigation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: