7 sec in total
537 ms
4.9 sec
1.5 sec
Visit liral.net now to see the best up-to-date Liral content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about liral.net
Visit liral.netWe analyzed Liral.net page load time and found that the first response time was 537 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
liral.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value4.3 s
41/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
537 ms
692 ms
45 ms
66 ms
784 ms
Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Liral.net, 33% (42 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 12% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Liral.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (21%)
6.5 MB
5.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Liral.net main page is 6.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 467.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liral images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 723.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 723.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 112.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liral.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 112.6 kB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (32%)
111
75
The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liral. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
liral.net
537 ms
692 ms
css
45 ms
css
66 ms
style.css
784 ms
animate.css
915 ms
jquery-1.8.2.js
1330 ms
js
64 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
508 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
388 ms
jquery.appear.js
537 ms
slick.js
1022 ms
parallax.js
771 ms
waypoints.min.js
5 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
682 ms
jquery.slimscroll.min.js
772 ms
main.js
893 ms
logo.png
323 ms
ico1.jpg
323 ms
ico2.jpg
147 ms
home.svg
273 ms
logo2.png
320 ms
bg.png
274 ms
log1.png
415 ms
log2.png
321 ms
log3.png
323 ms
log4.png
492 ms
log5.png
603 ms
log6.png
604 ms
log7.png
489 ms
log8.png
603 ms
log9.png
685 ms
log10.png
685 ms
log11.png
686 ms
log12.png
811 ms
log13.png
811 ms
ico1.png
730 ms
bg2-1.jpg
1666 ms
b8503d1c779a5e7.jpg
2138 ms
bg2-2.jpg
1875 ms
26b6cd3aa69bd7b.jpg
2179 ms
bg3.jpg
1288 ms
ico2.png
959 ms
ico3.png
1377 ms
ico4.png
1442 ms
bg4.jpg
2248 ms
bg5.jpg
1695 ms
uzor.png
1900 ms
circ1.png
1948 ms
circ2.png
2120 ms
circ3.png
2130 ms
circ4.png
2181 ms
circ5.png
2230 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
141 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
147 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
144 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
142 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
144 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi9-WlPSxbfiI49GsXo3q0g.ttf
143 ms
O4NhV7_qs9r9seTo7fnsVKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
143 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxpZ7xm-Bj30Bj2KNdXDzSZg.ttf
181 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxne1Pd76Vl7zRpE7NLJQ7XU.ttf
181 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxg89PwPrYLaRFJ-HNCU9NbA.ttf
182 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xBEM87DM3yorPOrvA-vB930.ttf
279 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xEMwSSh38KQVJx4ABtsZTnA.ttf
351 ms
common.js
132 ms
map.js
131 ms
util.js
217 ms
marker.js
131 ms
geometry.js
125 ms
poly.js
213 ms
bg6.jpg
2132 ms
bg7.jpg
2133 ms
close_ico.png
2147 ms
arrs2.png
2010 ms
madelogo.png
2169 ms
ico6.png
2152 ms
arrs.png
2172 ms
onion.js
27 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
88 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
165 ms
stats.js
56 ms
controls.js
49 ms
transparent.png
114 ms
css
21 ms
undo_poly.png
86 ms
point2.png
1865 ms
google4.png
52 ms
mapcnt6.png
50 ms
sv5.png
49 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
78 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
77 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
77 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
78 ms
tmapctrl.png
79 ms
cb_scout5.png
81 ms
tmapctrl4.png
79 ms
imgs8.png
80 ms
vt
72 ms
vt
54 ms
vt
52 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
45 ms
vt
46 ms
vt
71 ms
vt
82 ms
vt
48 ms
vt
79 ms
vt
59 ms
vt
67 ms
vt
70 ms
vt
109 ms
vt
75 ms
vt
77 ms
vt
119 ms
vt
117 ms
vt
105 ms
vt
106 ms
vt
108 ms
vt
111 ms
vt
109 ms
vt
111 ms
vt
131 ms
vt
135 ms
vt
117 ms
vt
136 ms
vt
139 ms
vt
144 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
172 ms
liral.net accessibility score
liral.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
liral.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liral.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liral.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liral.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liral. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: