15.3 sec in total
83 ms
3.3 sec
12 sec
Click here to check amazing Listermail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about listermail.com
We co‑innovate with the world’s most ambitious brands to create transformative digital experiences. Learn more about our work and our unique co-innovation model.
Visit listermail.comWe analyzed Listermail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 15.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
listermail.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value155.8 s
0/100
25%
Value15.2 s
1/100
10%
Value16,080 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.122
84/100
15%
Value158.4 s
0/100
10%
83 ms
172 ms
76 ms
338 ms
1135 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Listermail.com, 53% (21 requests) were made to Bounteous.com and 18% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 320.7 kB (14%)
2.2 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Listermail.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 320.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 320.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Listermail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 692 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (60%)
30
12
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Listermail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
listermail.com
83 ms
www.bounteous.com
172 ms
css2
76 ms
otSDKStub.js
338 ms
polyfill.min.js
1135 ms
polyfill-5e9414017258e7a7070d.js
69 ms
component---src-templates-home-page-js-624271f7abbed2b33486.js
48 ms
17e1309773f4a874631d267bf7dc21a5f703631b-a9dd78cc2d6df5e8900e.js
652 ms
c331737d4bc3e9d8bacd97dc6eaae6b1bc285b3a-2a486f174a4a84f83986.js
178 ms
commons-15a2011724796ebf112f.js
652 ms
05d954cf-c80b9b7dc98e96ff27d9.js
208 ms
2852872c-cabdfe413499f9ac5a51.js
171 ms
styles-136dffcde22e5b1103b3.js
247 ms
app-9540117ae96bc0538922.js
352 ms
framework-fbe54114083bab4bd0a1.js
291 ms
webpack-runtime-a1d1c92d14a75bc0a4cb.js
275 ms
3ece8cb6-c785-48ce-a44c-97957914c94b.json
503 ms
gtm.js
1270 ms
64pv
1103 ms
hero_wave-b19c8aeb144d9b529d23d37e5d979169.svg
1100 ms
b-shots.png
535 ms
waves-partners-ddcdf2b0450b9ca0e57ebf6a96726b86.svg
534 ms
educators-lines-e1e91aed451b84c830d12fee0a451286.svg
296 ms
location
1206 ms
pe0qMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cfe6.ttf
1537 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc8WAf5q.ttf
1538 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc9yAv5q.ttf
1528 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc9iB_5q.ttf
1504 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc8GBv5q.ttf
1554 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc8aBf5q.ttf
1673 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc8-BP5q.ttf
1550 ms
app-data.json
664 ms
page-data.json
666 ms
hotjar-2596574.js
529 ms
gtm.js
409 ms
gtm.js
520 ms
otBannerSdk.js
389 ms
1407953791.json
447 ms
3968789505.json
438 ms
972400240.json
437 ms
listermail.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
listermail.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
listermail.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Listermail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Listermail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
listermail.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Listermail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: