Tools & Wizards About Us
litareview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

litareview.com

易游网络_易游网络验证Wbeapi_app一键加易游验证

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

690 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

litareview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit litareview.com now to see the best up-to-date Litareview content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about litareview.com

易游网络_易游网络验证Wbeapi_app一键加易游验证(litareview.com)是专业的娱乐游戏平台，为广大游戏爱好者提供精品游戏，致力于游戏精细化app和优质的客户服务，成为深受玩家喜爱的游戏平台。

Visit litareview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Litareview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 690 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

litareview.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

litareview.com

690 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

111 ms

css

27 ms

style.css

85 ms

jquery.js

207 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Litareview.com, 42% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (690 ms) belongs to the original domain Litareview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 488.6 kB (67%)

Content Size

730.3 kB

After Optimization

241.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Litareview.com main page is 730.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 332.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 31.8 kB

  • Original 46.7 kB
  • After minification 44.5 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 70.5 kB
  • After minification 68.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litareview images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 221.1 kB

  • Original 332.0 kB
  • After minification 331.9 kB
  • After compression 110.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 233.4 kB

  • Original 281.0 kB
  • After minification 273.0 kB
  • After compression 47.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litareview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (17%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litareview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

litareview.com

litareview.com

690 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

111 ms

css

css

27 ms

style.css

style.css

85 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

207 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

80 ms

fever-frenzy1.jpg

fever-frenzy1.jpg

73 ms

fever-frenzy2-300x225.jpg

fever-frenzy2-300x225.jpg

100 ms

Fierce-Tales-The-Dogs-Heart-1-300x172.jpg

Fierce-Tales-The-Dogs-Heart-1-300x172.jpg

71 ms

DdiGekiibQ0

DdiGekiibQ0

121 ms

Lqyw6CKBlI4

Lqyw6CKBlI4

145 ms

yX_26v71yuE

yX_26v71yuE

151 ms

Uz2HRMhunv0

Uz2HRMhunv0

142 ms

Mef-OEmw9vI

Mef-OEmw9vI

148 ms

fwPKA20TCNk

fwPKA20TCNk

141 ms

cujMeGc8jzY

cujMeGc8jzY

192 ms

geATAOKWoNY

geATAOKWoNY

341 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

56 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

96 ms

Accessibility Review

litareview.com accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

litareview.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

litareview.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litareview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Litareview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

litareview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litareview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: