3.3 sec in total
295 ms
2.5 sec
509 ms
Visit litefox.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Lite Fox content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about litefox.co.uk
We are based in Greater Manchester and cover the surrounding areas including The North West and West Yorkshire for our onsite Managed I.T Solutions.
Visit litefox.co.ukWe analyzed Litefox.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 295 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
litefox.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value16.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value400 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.194
63/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
295 ms
464 ms
44 ms
338 ms
371 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Litefox.co.uk, 30% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Litefox.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (62%)
1.8 MB
688.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Litefox.co.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 890.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 375.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lite Fox needs image optimization as it can save up to 375.1 kB or 42% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 243.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 243.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 472.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litefox.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 472.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (44%)
36
20
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lite Fox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litefox.co.uk
295 ms
litefox.co.uk
464 ms
css
44 ms
animate.min.css
338 ms
aos.css
371 ms
bootstrap.min.css
554 ms
bootstrap-icons.css
431 ms
boxicons.min.css
414 ms
glightbox.min.css
342 ms
remixicon.css
528 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
441 ms
style.css
477 ms
Logo-White.svg
498 ms
hero-img.png
785 ms
features-1.png
693 ms
features-2.png
694 ms
features-3.png
695 ms
features-4.png
695 ms
bodhisolutions.png
696 ms
fletcherstewart.png
696 ms
greenmount.png
700 ms
missguided.png
696 ms
mrt.png
697 ms
probioenergy.png
698 ms
shimlas.png
761 ms
simplisafe.png
699 ms
thegreengroup.png
806 ms
oodleschinese.png
761 ms
manjaros.png
759 ms
aos.js
799 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
812 ms
glightbox.min.js
878 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
887 ms
validate.js
876 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
1081 ms
main.js
962 ms
api.js
52 ms
daisy_trustpay_logo.png
1127 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
153 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
152 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
180 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
190 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
189 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff
189 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff
189 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
189 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
189 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
190 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
192 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
191 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
183 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
185 ms
remixicon.woff
470 ms
bootstrap-icons.woff
329 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexg.woff
183 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexg.woff
185 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexg.woff
186 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexg.woff
185 ms
boxicons.woff
571 ms
app.php
601 ms
litefox.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
litefox.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
litefox.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litefox.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litefox.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litefox.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lite Fox. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: