4.2 sec in total
1.5 sec
2.5 sec
215 ms
Visit litegait.com now to see the best up-to-date Lite Gait content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about litegait.com
Visit litegait.comWe analyzed Litegait.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
litegait.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value22.8 s
0/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value1,580 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.165
71/100
15%
Value26.4 s
0/100
10%
1507 ms
136 ms
134 ms
133 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Litegait.com, 21% (14 requests) were made to Fbstatic-a.akamaihd.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Litegait.com.
Page size can be reduced by 515.0 kB (23%)
2.2 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Litegait.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lite Gait images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 290.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 290.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litegait.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (52%)
66
32
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lite Gait. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litegait.com
1507 ms
css_pbm0lsQQJ7A7WCCIMgxLho6mI_kBNgznNUWmTWcnfoE.css
136 ms
css_b8wqb8zAAttmPzcoltxR8DCWuTz8HnW2eSXnU9qdKpA.css
134 ms
css_w8JwqVbK5e5R6cwamAqSHGmR2GyLPLCdR21o9pdiXFQ.css
133 ms
css_Cd5O2fwx8vd_o4MdwEI-1A_ARkVFlaUyf-PJhetgEMI.css
151 ms
js_mj8--jUKjR2GqRpB2rxGEcuQTBbR480BEkLzP0vXCws.js
221 ms
js_3jHrF8HxeIaTJ_gvuXZkDgmRCsrmNu6NoD8Nmxd_5Gk.js
199 ms
js_Eeb-M81C6BClkb0Os1xGPmdhftDKAwY-_RJ6v9x600Q.js
202 ms
js_QYha8fKrxQgnYPMXuHw3Cvk1eLTwITUVAVKpMxj_lFI.js
210 ms
lightbox.js
222 ms
js_5idECjjAo-X5YdkT65CaIiodkWmZlZv-WjSkHlWhoYk.js
111 ms
image_captcha
612 ms
thumb_nl_02.gif
89 ms
thumb_INSV_02-1.gif
89 ms
LG200P_GKmini_01-2s.gif
165 ms
GKmini_wk_crawl_01-2s.gif
166 ms
GKmini_LG400_01-2s.gif
212 ms
gkmini_hc_01-2s.gif
243 ms
logo.png
261 ms
flags.png
195 ms
chat.png
242 ms
search.png
259 ms
banner_anniv_1.jpg
491 ms
banner_gk.jpg
428 ms
banner_ped.jpg
463 ms
banner_hng_0.jpg
651 ms
banner_gs.jpg
610 ms
banner_edu_0.jpg
620 ms
education.jpg
689 ms
IMG_5575.jpg
622 ms
100MX%20child%20%26%20PT%20PRODUCT.jpg
814 ms
fb.png
663 ms
tw.png
691 ms
yt.png
692 ms
em.png
715 ms
sdk.js
18 ms
opacity2.png
741 ms
tracking.js
85 ms
purple_tri.png
734 ms
banner_bg.png
730 ms
201 ms
xd_arbiter.php
49 ms
xd_arbiter.php
104 ms
script_data.js
131 ms
grippie.png
599 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
623 ms
localization.en.0.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d_06ca3588d2bb179f8479a83e74bb4152.js
40 ms
ping
73 ms
page.php
155 ms
page.php
244 ms
LUdypCgtRlc.css
38 ms
46icGyCHNkx.css
45 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
59 ms
YvxwM8R7ol8.js
78 ms
ihptErjAmMX.js
84 ms
cUsKAwzqrQw.js
86 ms
eJ-OD1MiSJg.js
86 ms
5219_10153892493423426_7708553234127483527_n.jpg
101 ms
144 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
48 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
48 ms
b53Ajb4ihCP.gif
48 ms
203 ms
R9a_DtVRZgv.js
6 ms
cUDgRFxaoIk.js
7 ms
0JBr1QHp8Gi.js
7 ms
kDOzhTr2W91.js
7 ms
litegait.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
litegait.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
litegait.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litegait.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Litegait.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litegait.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lite Gait. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: