2.5 sec in total
62 ms
2.1 sec
421 ms
Visit litekon.net now to see the best up-to-date Litekon content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about litekon.net
Litekon ensures that all products integrate with high quality innovative design, competitive pricing and efficient after sales.
Visit litekon.netWe analyzed Litekon.net page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
litekon.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value600 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
62 ms
1187 ms
90 ms
95 ms
97 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Litekon.net, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Litekon.net.
Page size can be reduced by 139.9 kB (10%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Litekon.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 864.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litekon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 966 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litekon.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (86%)
71
10
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litekon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litekon.net
62 ms
litekon.net
1187 ms
main.min.css
90 ms
front.min.css
95 ms
woocommerce-layout-grid.min.css
97 ms
woocommerce-grid.min.css
86 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
84 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
136 ms
swiper.min.css
143 ms
post-14.css
149 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
175 ms
global.css
159 ms
post-2610.css
203 ms
post-2672.css
197 ms
post-2740.css
212 ms
general.min.css
215 ms
ecs-style.css
248 ms
post-258.css
269 ms
css
35 ms
fontawesome.min.css
259 ms
solid.min.css
279 ms
brands.min.css
280 ms
front.min.js
171 ms
jquery.min.js
189 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
200 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
204 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
263 ms
js.cookie.min.js
223 ms
woocommerce.min.js
219 ms
ecs_ajax_pagination.js
249 ms
ecs.js
252 ms
litekon.net
834 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
26 ms
email-decode.min.js
113 ms
wc-blocks.css
188 ms
animations.min.css
189 ms
post-2723.css
229 ms
photoswipe.min.css
229 ms
default-skin.min.css
228 ms
frontend.min.js
286 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
228 ms
order-attribution.min.js
302 ms
general.min.js
303 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
307 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
302 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
301 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
350 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
351 ms
hooks.min.js
352 ms
i18n.min.js
358 ms
frontend.min.js
349 ms
waypoints.min.js
395 ms
core.min.js
403 ms
frontend.min.js
409 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
390 ms
jquery.zoom.min.js
397 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
412 ms
photoswipe.min.js
403 ms
photoswipe-ui-default.min.js
401 ms
underscore.min.js
407 ms
wp-util.min.js
405 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
413 ms
single-product.min.js
420 ms
d2d0f07cf9f8df6f959f497a9.js
163 ms
logo-whitev2.png
370 ms
20170202_111959.jpg
370 ms
20170202_114711.jpg
405 ms
litekon-logo@2x-1.png
416 ms
20170202_112241.jpg
382 ms
electrical-work.jpg
409 ms
smart.jpg
375 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
118 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
131 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
141 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
143 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
142 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
142 ms
kmKiZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qviTgY3KcY.woff
143 ms
kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNZaxU.woff
140 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
399 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
387 ms
default-skin.png
395 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen-grid.min.css
60 ms
litekon.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
litekon.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
litekon.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litekon.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litekon.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litekon.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Litekon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: