9.2 sec in total
392 ms
8.6 sec
237 ms
Click here to check amazing Lite Life content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about litelife.it
LiteLife è la SPA di Napoli che offre percorsi benessere, massaggi, trattamenti estetici, servizi di medicina estetica, consulenze mediche e palestra.
Visit litelife.itWe analyzed Litelife.it page load time and found that the first response time was 392 ms and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
litelife.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value18.9 s
0/100
25%
Value18.2 s
0/100
10%
Value9,340 ms
0/100
30%
Value1.024
2/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
392 ms
532 ms
145 ms
130 ms
234 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Litelife.it, 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) belongs to the original domain Litelife.it.
Page size can be reduced by 184.6 kB (8%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Litelife.it main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lite Life images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 51.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litelife.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (85%)
95
14
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lite Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litelife.it
392 ms
www.litelife.it
532 ms
analytics.js
145 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
130 ms
style.min.css
234 ms
style.css
248 ms
style.css
266 ms
styles.css
248 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
248 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
261 ms
diggdigg-style.css
350 ms
css
76 ms
esi-optinforms.css
366 ms
easy-slide-in.css
382 ms
font-awesome.min.css
418 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
379 ms
woocommerce.css
382 ms
form-basic.css
464 ms
style.css
489 ms
bootstrap.min.css
602 ms
owl.carousel.css
497 ms
royalslider.css
493 ms
rs-default.css
492 ms
stylesheet.css
573 ms
font-awesome.min.css
617 ms
style.css
657 ms
bootstrap-select.css
656 ms
comments.css
669 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.css
657 ms
shortcodes.css
684 ms
animate.css
695 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
704 ms
dashicons.min.css
922 ms
wp-pointer.min.css
712 ms
widgets.min.css
768 ms
global.css
798 ms
main_stylesheet.css
818 ms
woocommerce-twitterboostrap.css
840 ms
defaultFontStyle.css
846 ms
js
122 ms
easy-responsive-shortcodes.css
851 ms
collect
39 ms
font-awesome.css
827 ms
style.css
741 ms
thickbox.css
757 ms
jquery.min.js
872 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
798 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
815 ms
placeholder.js
808 ms
easy-slide-in.js
760 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
757 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
779 ms
index.js
781 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
799 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
803 ms
js.cookie.min.js
778 ms
main_stylesheet.css
752 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1061 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1062 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.js
1061 ms
jquery.royalslider.min.js
1046 ms
owl.carousel.js
949 ms
jquery.scrolly.js
900 ms
jquery.smoothscroll.js
900 ms
bootstrap.min.js
960 ms
bootstrap-select.js
949 ms
isotope.js
932 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
906 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.js
951 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
1019 ms
jquery.twitterfeed.js
1015 ms
tabAccTog.js
958 ms
main_script.js
929 ms
rooms_script.js
898 ms
um_booking.js
1034 ms
um_lightbox.js
1035 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1000 ms
frontend.min.js
990 ms
front_end_js.js
984 ms
thickbox.js
977 ms
frontend.js
954 ms
fbevents.js
208 ms
Litelife-logo_2018.png
653 ms
piscina_litelife.jpg
1453 ms
massaggio_litelife_slider.jpg
1126 ms
privacy-litelife.jpg
1404 ms
spa-relax-1.jpg
1653 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.woff
536 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
758 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1132 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1051 ms
identity.js
86 ms
178830312456661
245 ms
gen_204
90 ms
collect
38 ms
www.litelife.it
5000 ms
preloader-white.gif
288 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
350 ms
common.js
6 ms
util.js
16 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
127 ms
icon-user-01.png
121 ms
icon-email-01.png
118 ms
litelife.it accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
litelife.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
litelife.it SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litelife.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Italian language. Our system also found out that Litelife.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litelife.it
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lite Life. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: