Tools & Wizards About Us
litesplusinc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

litesplusinc.com

Commercial Lighting Company Lansing MI | Lighting Supply

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

858 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

243 ms

litesplusinc.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to litesplusinc.com homepage info - get ready to check Litesplusinc best content right away, or after learning these important things about litesplusinc.com

Lites Plus has years of experience helping customers with the application and rebate submission process. Contact us today.

Visit litesplusinc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Litesplusinc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 858 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

litesplusinc.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

litesplusinc.com

858 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

59 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

64 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

73 ms

woocommerce.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Litesplusinc.com, 47% (28 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (858 ms) belongs to the original domain Litesplusinc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 432.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Litesplusinc.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 257.6 kB

  • Original 299.4 kB
  • After minification 296.0 kB
  • After compression 41.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 257.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 174.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Litesplusinc needs image optimization as it can save up to 174.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 355 B

  • Original 146.7 kB
  • After minification 146.7 kB
  • After compression 146.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 49 B

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 31.3 kB
  • After compression 31.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litesplusinc.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (76%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litesplusinc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

litesplusinc.com

litesplusinc.com

858 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

59 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

64 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

73 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

69 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

89 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

68 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

72 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

82 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

83 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

87 ms

kk-script.js

kk-script.js

99 ms

9024af7b57165780cdc4f23.js

9024af7b57165780cdc4f23.js

559 ms

js

js

64 ms

js

js

54 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

17 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

logo.png

logo.png

58 ms

parallexsize.png

parallexsize.png

204 ms

Trade-Ally-1-1.png

Trade-Ally-1-1.png

76 ms

submit.js

submit.js

38 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

40 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

38 ms

mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js

mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js

40 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

96 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

89 ms

common.js

common.js

88 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

47 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

53 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff

55 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

55 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

55 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

53 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

55 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

56 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

56 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

75 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

75 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

77 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff

77 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

78 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

78 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

78 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

78 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

80 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

79 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

80 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

80 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

81 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff

81 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

82 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff

82 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

82 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

154 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

25 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

26 ms

Accessibility Review

litesplusinc.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

litesplusinc.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

litesplusinc.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litesplusinc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litesplusinc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

litesplusinc.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Litesplusinc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: