3.5 sec in total
814 ms
2.4 sec
330 ms
Visit lithology.ru now to see the best up-to-date Lithology content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lithology.ru
Visit lithology.ruWe analyzed Lithology.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 814 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lithology.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.6 s
92/100
10%
814 ms
137 ms
262 ms
268 ms
269 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Lithology.ru, 11% (4 requests) were made to Yastatic.net and 8% (3 requests) were made to Site.yandex.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (814 ms) belongs to the original domain Lithology.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 113.2 kB (53%)
214.0 kB
100.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Lithology.ru main page is 214.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 93.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 236 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lithology images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 32% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lithology.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (81%)
36
7
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lithology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lithology.ru
814 ms
node.css
137 ms
defaults.css
262 ms
system.css
268 ms
system-menus.css
269 ms
user.css
270 ms
content-module.css
275 ms
date.css
270 ms
forum.css
390 ms
fieldgroup.css
396 ms
views.css
395 ms
acidfree.css
396 ms
style.css
397 ms
jquery.js
536 ms
drupal.js
514 ms
ru_5eb39be099de500fb221f44549441504.js
524 ms
acidfree.js
523 ms
share.js
44 ms
form.js
29 ms
bg-navigation.png
150 ms
body.png
158 ms
bg-navigation-item-hover.png
153 ms
bg-navigation-item.png
153 ms
menu-leaf.gif
144 ms
feed.png
148 ms
bg-content.png
250 ms
bg-content-right.png
256 ms
bg-content-left.png
254 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
b-share-form-button.png
62 ms
watch.js
3 ms
b-share-form-button_share__icon.png
54 ms
b-share-icon.png
60 ms
b-share-popup_down__tail.png
58 ms
_form.js
9 ms
yandex52x21x24-rb.png
20 ms
print.css
126 ms
arrow.xml
618 ms
lithology.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
lithology.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lithology.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lithology.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lithology.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lithology.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lithology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: