Tools & Wizards About Us
litirus.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

litirus.ru

Главная

Page Load Speed

11.4 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

11.1 sec

Page Rendered

113 ms

litirus.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to litirus.ru homepage info - get ready to check Litirus best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about litirus.ru

Сочинения, анализ стихотворения, рефераты, биографии писателей, поэтов, критиков, подготовка к экзамену по литературе, русскому языку и культуре речи

Visit litirus.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Litirus.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

litirus.ru performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

litirus.ru

164 ms

litirus.ru

191 ms

style.css

118 ms

jcomments-v2.0.js

119 ms

ajax.js

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Litirus.ru, 20% (9 requests) were made to St6-21.vk.com and 13% (6 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.6 sec) relates to the external source Recreativ.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 117.7 kB (18%)

Content Size

668.0 kB

After Optimization

550.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Litirus.ru main page is 668.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 404.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 51.2 kB

  • Original 66.7 kB
  • After minification 64.1 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 50.8 kB
  • After minification 46.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litirus images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 404.4 kB
  • After minification 404.4 kB
  • After compression 380.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 146.1 kB
  • After minification 146.1 kB
  • After compression 108.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litirus.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (67%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litirus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

litirus.ru

litirus.ru

164 ms

litirus.ru

litirus.ru

191 ms

style.css

style.css

118 ms

jcomments-v2.0.js

jcomments-v2.0.js

119 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

126 ms

template_css.css

template_css.css

121 ms

rcode.e5bbec8037.js

rcode.e5bbec8037.js

9604 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

82 ms

share.js

share.js

524 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

266 ms

litirus.ru_5_64.107.199.gif

litirus.ru_5_64.107.199.gif

215 ms

top_bg.jpg

top_bg.jpg

115 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

113 ms

space.gif

space.gif

109 ms

act_nav.jpg

act_nav.jpg

112 ms

mod_left.jpg

mod_left.jpg

28 ms

menu.gif

menu.gif

25 ms

openapi.318ba3d5a50b8d6990cb0284cb0e0963.js

openapi.318ba3d5a50b8d6990cb0284cb0e0963.js

256 ms

strelka.jpg

strelka.jpg

112 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

255 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

129 ms

widget_like.php

widget_like.php

328 ms

mod_right.jpg

mod_right.jpg

105 ms

footer.jpg

footer.jpg

111 ms

hit

hit

285 ms

b-share-form-button.png

b-share-form-button.png

537 ms

watch.js

watch.js

0 ms

b-share-form-button_share__icon.png

b-share-form-button_share__icon.png

632 ms

b-share-icon.png

b-share-icon.png

722 ms

b-share-popup_down__tail.png

b-share-popup_down__tail.png

813 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

30 ms

ads

ads

39 ms

hit

hit

516 ms

ads

ads

36 ms

loader_nav21083858833_3.js

loader_nav21083858833_3.js

301 ms

lite.93f44416.css

lite.93f44416.css

602 ms

lang3_2.js

lang3_2.js

573 ms

c3d11fba.5504cac7.js

c3d11fba.5504cac7.js

468 ms

vkui.388c7a16.css

vkui.388c7a16.css

624 ms

xdm.js

xdm.js

501 ms

widgets.d2d14ebe.css

widgets.d2d14ebe.css

501 ms

al_like.js

al_like.js

504 ms

base.ec2ae8ae.css

base.ec2ae8ae.css

577 ms

lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js

lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js

378 ms

like_widget.png

like_widget.png

87 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

79 ms

Accessibility Review

litirus.ru accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

litirus.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

litirus.ru SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litirus.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Litirus.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

litirus.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litirus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: