4.1 sec in total
280 ms
3.5 sec
321 ms
Welcome to litlib.net homepage info - get ready to check Litlib best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about litlib.net
Добро пожаловать на наш книжный сайт! Здесь вы найдете огромный выбор книг различных жанров, включая бестселлеры, классику, современную прозу, детективы, фантастику, любовные романы и многое другое. У...
Visit litlib.netWe analyzed Litlib.net page load time and found that the first response time was 280 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
litlib.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value8.4 s
19/100
10%
Value440 ms
64/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
280 ms
325 ms
86 ms
252 ms
261 ms
Our browser made a total of 155 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Litlib.net, 11% (17 requests) were made to Is.luxup.ru and 8% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (684 ms) belongs to the original domain Litlib.net.
Page size can be reduced by 541.2 kB (38%)
1.4 MB
878.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Litlib.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 722.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litlib images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 381.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 381.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litlib.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (48%)
136
71
The browser has sent 136 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litlib. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
litlib.net
280 ms
www.litlib.net
325 ms
style.css
86 ms
11206.js
252 ms
jquery-2.1.1.js
261 ms
book_scroll.js
177 ms
11206.js
290 ms
openapi.js
380 ms
bn.php
202 ms
bn.php
203 ms
aci.js
222 ms
LL.png
253 ms
button1.png
88 ms
go.jpg
88 ms
rsh.png
196 ms
rss.png
197 ms
cover.jpg
271 ms
cover.jpg
271 ms
cover.jpg
271 ms
cover.jpg
333 ms
cover.jpg
338 ms
cover.jpg
425 ms
cover.jpg
433 ms
cover.jpg
440 ms
cover.jpg
442 ms
cover.jpg
502 ms
cover.jpg
509 ms
cover.jpg
526 ms
cover.jpg
605 ms
cover.jpg
613 ms
cover.jpg
624 ms
shl.png
666 ms
shcentr.png
585 ms
title2_b.jpg
597 ms
box_tall.gif
659 ms
box_bott.gif
677 ms
list_bac.gif
581 ms
pimp1000.gif
585 ms
box_titm.jpg
596 ms
box_titl.png
642 ms
box_titn.png
643 ms
page_fa.png
661 ms
page_f.png
668 ms
upload.gif
128 ms
widget_community.php
279 ms
left_foot.png
649 ms
centr_foot.png
684 ms
hit
270 ms
ga.js
10 ms
right_foot.png
662 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
uid.php
108 ms
fpx.php
351 ms
tk.php
107 ms
341 ms
319 ms
ajs.php
73 ms
ajs.php
71 ms
lb146662.js
383 ms
up.png
649 ms
100 ms
189 ms
191 ms
189 ms
309040.js
259 ms
lg.php
24 ms
210443.js
272 ms
lg.php
22 ms
match.aspx
19 ms
253 ms
loader_nav19127_3.js
134 ms
lite.css
135 ms
lite.js
386 ms
lang3_0.js
253 ms
widget_community.css
255 ms
xdm.js
255 ms
al_community.js
254 ms
dsp
384 ms
showad_full.js
253 ms
advmaker
461 ms
rsc.php
195 ms
advmaker
294 ms
382 ms
match
198 ms
1x1.gif
171 ms
adi
298 ms
adi
303 ms
G_ZQ0HKRXJ0.jpg
391 ms
X8grv1OHJSw.jpg
407 ms
eDgnMBTWV24.jpg
391 ms
e_9227a4a5.jpg
404 ms
CWvl4kFGe5U.jpg
392 ms
9OPijwaYSGw.jpg
277 ms
I2CwXu4_iPg.jpg
394 ms
5gDVw_lqyCI.jpg
399 ms
MJiHBOEpGpc.jpg
392 ms
jWCe4V9qefM.jpg
400 ms
wzmFPGj5a-8.jpg
396 ms
OKkIiO8wzRc.jpg
396 ms
7hB5Fphf5sw.jpg
398 ms
camera_50.png
128 ms
w_logo.png
127 ms
advmaker
103 ms
bn1.php
336 ms
ambn.png
195 ms
sync.cgi
264 ms
counter
315 ms
renegade-smart
201 ms
pixel
17 ms
emily
422 ms
audtd.png
518 ms
sync
249 ms
sync
352 ms
556d807310823b694772f699.js
178 ms
pixel
14 ms
462 ms
renegade-smart
106 ms
sync
128 ms
dispatch.fcgi
171 ms
admitad
250 ms
pixel
38 ms
index.php
200 ms
pixel.gif
101 ms
444 ms
edge.5.0.0.min.js
197 ms
conflict_html5_video_240x400_edge.js
99 ms
conflict_html5_video_240x400_edge.js
98 ms
3872542_468.jpg
267 ms
pixel
17 ms
sync
254 ms
sync.cgi
132 ms
180 ms
3964166_528.jpg
263 ms
3964160_627.jpg
264 ms
3875873_201.jpg
265 ms
3872788_229.jpg
269 ms
3964165_243.jpg
268 ms
3908655_325.jpg
390 ms
3955249_014.jpg
393 ms
3957011_546.jpg
392 ms
3872779_287.jpg
393 ms
3978295_988.jpg
398 ms
3978296_989.jpg
399 ms
3976345_902.jpg
515 ms
3964518_620.jpg
524 ms
3976355_933.jpg
522 ms
3958387_143.jpg
523 ms
3963925_130.jpg
527 ms
250 ms
logoconf.png
194 ms
btncnf.png
283 ms
134 ms
252 ms
227 ms
200 ms
litlib.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
litlib.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
litlib.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litlib.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litlib.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litlib.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litlib. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: