20.3 sec in total
1.2 sec
17.3 sec
1.8 sec
Welcome to litlive.ru homepage info - get ready to check Litlive best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about litlive.ru
This domain may be for sale!
Visit litlive.ruWe analyzed Litlive.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 19.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Litlive.ru rating and web reputation
litlive.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.189
65/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
1218 ms
313 ms
310 ms
319 ms
321 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Litlive.ru, 12% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (5 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15.5 sec) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 323.6 kB (51%)
638.5 kB
314.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Litlive.ru main page is 638.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 220.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litlive images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 136.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.5 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litlive.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (59%)
68
28
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litlive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litlive.ru
1218 ms
idoblog.css
313 ms
default.css
310 ms
jcomments-v2.1.js
319 ms
ajax.js
321 ms
mootools.js
481 ms
caption.js
377 ms
jquery.min.js
9 ms
system.css
461 ms
general.css
466 ms
typo.css
474 ms
ja.script.js
474 ms
ja.moomenu.css
532 ms
ja.moomenu.js
611 ms
addons.css
623 ms
template.css
629 ms
ja.newsflash.css
632 ms
blue.css
633 ms
op.css
698 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
watch.js
168 ms
css
23 ms
watch.js
15502 ms
2ifepxx1wog.gif
217 ms
valid1941_hc01cd41b29c5868a8871491b054e3e24.jpg
212 ms
logo.jpg
213 ms
search-bg.gif
212 ms
nav-active.gif
213 ms
nav-bg.gif
204 ms
default.gif
212 ms
little_mariks_1329404967.jpg
213 ms
little_sergeev_1334250873.jpg
308 ms
Folkner.jpg
476 ms
%D0%96%D0%9B_1370598259.jpg
317 ms
5765443.jpg
477 ms
3123.jpg
322 ms
%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2_1371662957.jpg
363 ms
image_410105111824065769638.jpg
463 ms
little_rudalev_1280747548.jpg
476 ms
462.jpg
477 ms
little_evgarm_1284118918.jpg
582 ms
little_admin_1374495526.jpg
694 ms
%D0%A1%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%86%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_1371152487.jpg
694 ms
%D0%AE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2_1375028449.jpg
695 ms
little_kritik-1972_1292698342.jpg
695 ms
%D0%A1%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_1371664003.jpg
695 ms
1320599127_1320590883_car.jpg
740 ms
%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_1371720841.jpg
768 ms
121353127.jpg
789 ms
%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_1371721473.jpg
790 ms
2124.jpg
791 ms
little_GSHHEKINA_1292764054.jpg
793 ms
little_aaantonov_1298019898.jpg
903 ms
zrt_lookup.html
127 ms
show_ads_impl.js
49 ms
qkE6YsKPRiYUugBb1_QwHC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
126 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPTGiFLLa8QnHfpD_B0brrWo.ttf
177 ms
ads
294 ms
comments_small.png
779 ms
osd.js
57 ms
ads
235 ms
pluso-like.js
281 ms
bullet.gif
681 ms
hit
258 ms
likebox.php
252 ms
hit
168 ms
McLpmVM3wCm.css
44 ms
VH4VPudaxfN.css
56 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
56 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
55 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
47 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
102 ms
180895_146280215432780_5265501_n.jpg
44 ms
305532_252122834913108_411846026_n.jpg
14 ms
12804728_10153587881348167_4517803030725933543_n.jpg
30 ms
12524105_428183190719584_6275665068623128241_n.jpg
15 ms
11041216_905676669512837_7148935303429127308_n.jpg
40 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
8 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
11 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
2 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
5 ms
litlive.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
litlive.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
litlive.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litlive.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Litlive.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litlive.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litlive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: