1.3 sec in total
302 ms
826 ms
204 ms
Click here to check amazing Litoro content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about litoro.com
OROTRON delivers comprehensive web services ranging from custom website design to development of complex internet systems.
Visit litoro.comWe analyzed Litoro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 302 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
litoro.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value37.6 s
0/100
10%
Value35,320 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value71.6 s
0/100
10%
302 ms
82 ms
84 ms
126 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Litoro.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (455 ms) belongs to the original domain Litoro.com.
Page size can be reduced by 395.4 kB (31%)
1.3 MB
898.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Litoro.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 911.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Litoro needs image optimization as it can save up to 126.5 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 220.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 220.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litoro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (23%)
43
33
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litoro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litoro.com
302 ms
reset.css
82 ms
text.css
84 ms
960_16_col.css
126 ms
layout.css
165 ms
nav.css
125 ms
css
24 ms
jquery-1.7.min.js
171 ms
jquery-ui.js
359 ms
jquery-fluid16.js
43 ms
jquery.bxSlider.min.js
145 ms
jquery.infieldlabel.min.js
71 ms
ga.js
25 ms
mainbg.jpg
128 ms
comp.png
88 ms
mockbank.png
161 ms
vgr1.jpg
196 ms
jp.jpg
286 ms
gec.jpg
188 ms
idt.jpg
287 ms
twills.jpg
240 ms
aa.png
272 ms
web-design.png
237 ms
web-application.png
282 ms
ul-design.png
281 ms
web-host.png
350 ms
nav-bg.png
372 ms
logo.jpg
381 ms
jp.jpg
375 ms
nar.png
376 ms
ram.png
378 ms
bala.png
379 ms
sri.png
380 ms
nary.png
380 ms
jay.png
381 ms
BulletGrey1.png
381 ms
mockbank.png
396 ms
jp.png
440 ms
gec.jpg
448 ms
vgr.jpg
447 ms
naata.jpg
447 ms
idt.jpg
414 ms
twills.jpg
435 ms
aa.png
455 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
bYbkq2nU2TSx4SwFbz5sCInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
7 ms
BAErcm-yHtTwg73NDhvJwg.ttf
10 ms
litoro.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
litoro.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
litoro.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litoro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Litoro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litoro.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litoro. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: