12.4 sec in total
328 ms
11.7 sec
406 ms
Welcome to littera.lv homepage info - get ready to check Littera best content for Latvia right away, or after learning these important things about littera.lv
Tulkošanas birojs Rīgā ⭐️ Tulkot kvalitatīvi - rakstiskie un mutiskie tulkojumi Rīgas tulkošanas birojs piedāvā labākas cenas ✓ 80 valodas
Visit littera.lvWe analyzed Littera.lv page load time and found that the first response time was 328 ms and then it took 12.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
littera.lv performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value680 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
328 ms
3832 ms
188 ms
181 ms
177 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Littera.lv, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Littera.lv.
Page size can be reduced by 13.9 MB (84%)
16.6 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Littera.lv main page is 16.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 15.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Littera needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.7 MB or 84% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 643.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 643.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 504.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Littera.lv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 504.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (75%)
79
20
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Littera. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
littera.lv
328 ms
3832 ms
k2.css
188 ms
modal.css
181 ms
style.css
177 ms
bootstrap.min.css
292 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
192 ms
bootstrap-extended.css
200 ms
bootstrap-frontend.min.css
361 ms
bootstrap-responsive-frontend.min.css
368 ms
system.css
380 ms
general.css
381 ms
template.css
375 ms
template_pro.css
471 ms
grey.css
546 ms
custom.css
548 ms
jsn_wide.css
549 ms
jsn_mobile.css
568 ms
custom.css
564 ms
css
966 ms
style.css
720 ms
skitter.styles.css
723 ms
template.css
725 ms
mootools-core.js
847 ms
core.js
747 ms
jquery.min.js
991 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
898 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
909 ms
k2.js
922 ms
mootools-more.js
1220 ms
modal.js
1085 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1101 ms
caption.js
1095 ms
noconflict.js
1138 ms
utils.js
1172 ms
jsn_template.js
1261 ms
230
1443 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1282 ms
pagebuilder.css
1162 ms
jsn-gui-frontend.css
1175 ms
front_end.css
1229 ms
front_end_responsive.css
1257 ms
fileuploader.js
1272 ms
glDatePicker.js
1209 ms
chosen.jquery.js
1179 ms
jquery.min.js
1367 ms
jsn_is_conflict.js
1354 ms
system.css
1241 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1353 ms
jquery.animate-colors-min.js
1258 ms
jquery.skitter.js
1205 ms
joomlashine.noconflict.js
1260 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1261 ms
jsn-bootstrap.css
94 ms
jsn-fonticomoon.css
169 ms
icomoon.css
181 ms
font-awesome.min.css
190 ms
bg-master.png
2154 ms
littera-logo-1.png
467 ms
icons-uni.png
430 ms
en.gif
208 ms
ru.gif
206 ms
lv.gif
208 ms
legal-translate-lv.png
1481 ms
labakas-cenas-tulkojumiem-latvija-riga-eiropa-pasaule.png
1566 ms
TRANSLATE.png
1542 ms
tulkojums.png
1483 ms
litera-tulkojumi-ofiss.png
1116 ms
gr1.png
1510 ms
gr3.png
1976 ms
gr4a.png
1988 ms
gr2.png
1995 ms
submit.png
1683 ms
icons-base-2.png
1743 ms
analytics.js
114 ms
ui.png
1753 ms
upload.png
1801 ms
prev.png
1944 ms
next.png
1997 ms
ajax-loader.gif
2004 ms
collect
16 ms
littera.lv accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
littera.lv best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
littera.lv SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
LV
LV
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Littera.lv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Latvian/Lettish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Littera.lv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
littera.lv
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Littera. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: