Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

littledream.com

Camden Maine, A Little Dream Bed & Breakfast Camden Maine ME Romantic Getaway Inn

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

93 ms

Resources Loaded

950 ms

Page Rendered

153 ms

littledream.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to littledream.com homepage info - get ready to check Little Dream best content right away, or after learning these important things about littledream.com

Lovely rooms, some with bay views, deck or fireplace. Beautiful bedding, extravagant breakfast, in a charming Camden Historic District setting. Linger in 19th Century graciousness....

Visit littledream.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Littledream.com page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

littledream.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

littledream.com

93 ms

ga.js

13 ms

dreamlogo2.jpg

79 ms

place.gif

48 ms

table.jpg

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Littledream.com, 34% (20 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 24% (14 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-2.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (515 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.7 kB (4%)

Content Size

388.9 kB

After Optimization

374.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Littledream.com main page is 388.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 358.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 13.2 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 358.5 kB
  • After minification 353.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Little Dream images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (43%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Little Dream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

littledream.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

littledream.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

littledream.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Littledream.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Littledream.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Little Dream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: