Tools & Wizards About Us
littlelambdesign.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

littlelambdesign.com

LLD Designs - Invitations, Announcements, Holiday Cards & More

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

336 ms

Resources Loaded

908 ms

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

littlelambdesign.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Littlelambdesign content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about littlelambdesign.com

Shop Photo Christmas & Holiday Cards, Wedding Suites, Invitations, Graduation Announcements, Birth Announcements, Stationery, Thank You Notes

Visit littlelambdesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Littlelambdesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 336 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

littlelambdesign.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value40.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.866

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

littlelambdesign.com

336 ms

js

109 ms

bugsnag.min.js

20 ms

bootstrap.min.css

31 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Littlelambdesign.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.feedbackify.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (336 ms) belongs to the original domain Littlelambdesign.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 383.4 kB (5%)

Content Size

7.6 MB

After Optimization

7.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Littlelambdesign.com main page is 7.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 110.0 kB

  • Original 119.4 kB
  • After minification 104.8 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.0 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 259.1 kB

  • Original 7.4 MB
  • After minification 7.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Littlelambdesign images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 949 B

  • Original 11.1 kB
  • After minification 11.1 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 68.9 kB
  • After minification 68.9 kB
  • After compression 55.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Littlelambdesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Littlelambdesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

littlelambdesign.com

littlelambdesign.com

336 ms

js

js

109 ms

bugsnag.min.js

bugsnag.min.js

20 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

31 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

45 ms

simple-line-icons.css

simple-line-icons.css

52 ms

MegaNavbar.min.css

MegaNavbar.min.css

53 ms

navbar-inverse.css

navbar-inverse.css

54 ms

printswell.css

printswell.css

56 ms

styles_dev.css

styles_dev.css

68 ms

responsive-margins.css

responsive-margins.css

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

82 ms

raphael.min.js

raphael.min.js

68 ms

fraphael.js

fraphael.js

71 ms

jquery.matchHeight.js

jquery.matchHeight.js

71 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

72 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

98 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

80 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

102 ms

imgix.min.js

imgix.min.js

103 ms

bootbox.min.js

bootbox.min.js

104 ms

paper.js

paper.js

106 ms

jquery.unveil.js

jquery.unveil.js

106 ms

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js

107 ms

hoverintent.js

hoverintent.js

106 ms

textfill.min.js

textfill.min.js

122 ms

site.js

site.js

122 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

123 ms

f.js

f.js

187 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

47 ms

4_1669415753.jpg

4_1669415753.jpg

85 ms

4_1500578873.jpg

4_1500578873.jpg

94 ms

5_1667330702.jpg

5_1667330702.jpg

87 ms

6_1723781287.jpg

6_1723781287.jpg

86 ms

7_1667330731.jpg

7_1667330731.jpg

92 ms

14_1667330688.jpg

14_1667330688.jpg

92 ms

newsletter-signup-icon.png

newsletter-signup-icon.png

93 ms

193_1726583463.jpg

193_1726583463.jpg

324 ms

205_1726583757.jpg

205_1726583757.jpg

211 ms

181_1721322993.jpg

181_1721322993.jpg

256 ms

23_1726582685.jpg

23_1726582685.jpg

229 ms

24_1726582694.jpg

24_1726582694.jpg

199 ms

25_1726582702.jpg

25_1726582702.jpg

235 ms

sessions.bugsnag.com

sessions.bugsnag.com

84 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

213 ms

css

css

32 ms

23_1726582685.jpg

23_1726582685.jpg

259 ms

24_1726582694.jpg

24_1726582694.jpg

262 ms

25_1726582702.jpg

25_1726582702.jpg

295 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

18 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

21 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

36 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

35 ms

tab.png

tab.png

35 ms

Accessibility Review

littlelambdesign.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

littlelambdesign.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

littlelambdesign.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Littlelambdesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Littlelambdesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

littlelambdesign.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Littlelambdesign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: