5.2 sec in total
356 ms
3.7 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to littlemarcel.com homepage info - get ready to check LITTLE MARCEL best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about littlemarcel.com
Visit littlemarcel.comWe analyzed Littlemarcel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 356 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
littlemarcel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value4.0 s
48/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value970 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.041
99/100
15%
Value8.3 s
39/100
10%
356 ms
656 ms
207 ms
308 ms
345 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Littlemarcel.com, 19% (15 requests) were made to Cdn.littlemarcel.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ltm.saint-louis.systemfuzion.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.littlemarcel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 308.2 kB (12%)
2.6 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Littlemarcel.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 248.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 248.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LITTLE MARCEL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 59.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (77%)
73
17
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LITTLE MARCEL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 57 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
littlemarcel.com
356 ms
littlemarcel.com
656 ms
jquery.min.js
207 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
308 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
345 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
350 ms
js.cookie.min.js
350 ms
woocommerce.min.js
350 ms
jarallax.js
351 ms
scalapay_translations_handler.js
434 ms
TweenMax.min.js
518 ms
jquery-panr.min.js
434 ms
mailin-front.js
435 ms
lazysizes.min.js
339 ms
jquery.selectBox.min.js
342 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
417 ms
jquery.yith-wcwl.min.js
435 ms
rbtools.min.js
652 ms
rs6.min.js
767 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
462 ms
order-attribution.min.js
519 ms
site_main.js
525 ms
awdr-dynamic-price.js
541 ms
alg-wc-ean-variations.min.js
568 ms
underscore.min.js
622 ms
wp-util.min.js
627 ms
main.js
646 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.min.js
675 ms
login.js
725 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
729 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
752 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
758 ms
index.js
781 ms
header-cart.min.js
827 ms
footer.min.js
832 ms
tooltipster.bundle.js
859 ms
main.min.js
864 ms
quantity.min.js
871 ms
awdr_pro.js
777 ms
sticky-header.js
687 ms
dropdown.js
690 ms
search-popup.js
718 ms
cart-canvas.min.js
721 ms
nav-mobile.js
729 ms
bdt-uikit.min.js
883 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
702 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
706 ms
waypoints.min.js
738 ms
core.min.js
745 ms
frontend.min.js
749 ms
prime-slider-site.min.js
726 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
727 ms
hooks.min.js
750 ms
i18n.min.js
730 ms
frontend.min.js
700 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
720 ms
elementor-frontend.js
712 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
722 ms
lazyload.min.js
676 ms
Gilroy-Medium.woff
717 ms
Gilroy-Bold.woff
782 ms
ekommart-icon.woff
793 ms
Little-Marcel-Logo-3.png
736 ms
logo-dark.svg
516 ms
payment.png
42 ms
Little-Marcel-barre.webp
640 ms
logoLM.png
743 ms
LITTLEMARCEL-PHOTO-ACCUEIL-UNIVERS-WEB-611x1024.jpg
980 ms
logoMRM.png
772 ms
23847090_1876864895663815_8706777714831220934_o-1.webp
878 ms
3VLM221123-2-1.jpg
1147 ms
3-VLM221123-WEB.jpg
1241 ms
1-CABERI-MULTIFN-WEB.jpg
1250 ms
1-TORAC-BLANC-WEB.jpg
1304 ms
2-TORAC-BLANC-WEB.jpg
1301 ms
Little-Marcel-barre-300x32.webp
1086 ms
87a2c5_66a6bfe730e74f5da76154545e16808dmv2-1.webp
1193 ms
Little-Marcel.png
1250 ms
spinner.gif
1299 ms
littlemarcel.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
littlemarcel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
littlemarcel.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Littlemarcel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Littlemarcel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
littlemarcel.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LITTLE MARCEL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: