Tools & Wizards About Us
littlepepper.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

littlepepper.com

My WordPress – Just another WordPress site

Page Load Speed

987 ms in total

First Response

341 ms

Resources Loaded

507 ms

Page Rendered

139 ms

littlepepper.com screenshot

About Website

Visit littlepepper.com now to see the best up-to-date Littlepepper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about littlepepper.com

New York City-based Web site developer, offering web design, web programming, and web hosting services at extremely competitive prices.

Visit littlepepper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Littlepepper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 646 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

littlepepper.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

littlepepper.com

341 ms

iezn_embed_patch.0.41.js

79 ms

bg.gif

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Littlepepper.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (341 ms) belongs to the original domain Littlepepper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.1 kB (71%)

Content Size

5.8 kB

After Optimization

1.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Littlepepper.com main page is 5.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 4.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 862 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 807 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 862 B or 52% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 873 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Littlepepper. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

littlepepper.com

littlepepper.com

341 ms

iezn_embed_patch.0.41.js

iezn_embed_patch.0.41.js

79 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

81 ms

Accessibility Review

littlepepper.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

littlepepper.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

littlepepper.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Littlepepper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Littlepepper.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

littlepepper.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Littlepepper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: