Report Summary

  • 2

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

littlerock.com.mt

LITTLEROCK - Malta's bi-lingual recipe website with several thousand recipes to choose from, including traditional Maltese dishes.

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

443 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

487 ms

littlerock.com.mt screenshot

About Website

Visit littlerock.com.mt now to see the best up-to-date LITTLEROCK content for Malta and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about littlerock.com.mt

Malta's bi-lingual recipe website with several thousand recipes to choose from, including traditional Maltese dishes.

Visit littlerock.com.mt

Key Findings

We analyzed Littlerock.com.mt page load time and found that the first response time was 443 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

littlerock.com.mt performance score

2

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value16,390 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.532

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

littlerock.com.mt

443 ms

littlerock.com.mt

413 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

319 ms

style.min.css

408 ms

swipebox.css

424 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Littlerock.com.mt, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Littlerock.com.mt.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 114.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

645.9 kB

After Optimization

531.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Littlerock.com.mt main page is 645.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 393.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 94.1 kB

  • Original 111.3 kB
  • After minification 96.7 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 20.0 kB

  • Original 393.9 kB
  • After minification 373.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LITTLEROCK images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 197 B

  • Original 140.7 kB
  • After minification 140.7 kB
  • After compression 140.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (49%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LITTLEROCK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

littlerock.com.mt accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

littlerock.com.mt best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

littlerock.com.mt SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Littlerock.com.mt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Littlerock.com.mt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LITTLEROCK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: