Tools & Wizards About Us
littlestinger.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

littlestinger.com

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

148 ms

Resources Loaded

715 ms

Page Rendered

183 ms

littlestinger.com screenshot

About Website

Visit littlestinger.com now to see the best up-to-date Littlestinger content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about littlestinger.com

A WebsiteBuilder Website

Visit littlestinger.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Littlestinger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 898 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

littlestinger.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

littlestinger.com

148 ms

main.css

53 ms

colorscheme.css

97 ms

style.css

92 ms

live_tinc.js

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Littlestinger.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (462 ms) belongs to the original domain Littlestinger.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 228.4 kB (43%)

Content Size

526.6 kB

After Optimization

298.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Littlestinger.com main page is 526.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 500.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 739 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 206.2 kB

  • Original 500.7 kB
  • After minification 294.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Littlestinger needs image optimization as it can save up to 206.2 kB or 41% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB
  • After compression 819 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 18.8 kB
  • After minification 10.6 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Littlestinger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Littlestinger. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

littlestinger.com

littlestinger.com

148 ms

main.css

main.css

53 ms

colorscheme.css

colorscheme.css

97 ms

style.css

style.css

92 ms

live_tinc.js

live_tinc.js

99 ms

pgbk.gif

pgbk.gif

54 ms

contentbg.gif

contentbg.gif

63 ms

headerbg.gif

headerbg.gif

54 ms

navbg.gif

navbg.gif

68 ms

n1activeitem.gif

n1activeitem.gif

100 ms

n1.gif

n1.gif

101 ms

_wsb_keyvisual.png

_wsb_keyvisual.png

462 ms

hbg.gif

hbg.gif

104 ms

stinger_1.jpg

stinger_1.jpg

205 ms

footerbg.gif

footerbg.gif

119 ms

Accessibility Review

littlestinger.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

littlestinger.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

littlestinger.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Littlestinger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Littlestinger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

littlestinger.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Littlestinger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: