3.5 sec in total
424 ms
2.9 sec
164 ms
Welcome to litva.lt homepage info - get ready to check LITVA best content for Latvia right away, or after learning these important things about litva.lt
Лучшие санатории, гостиницы и СПА в Литве. Бронируйте напрямую в Литве на русском языке — отели и санатории Литвы! Литовский туроператор, без посредников.
Visit litva.ltWe analyzed Litva.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
litva.lt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.6 s
0/100
10%
Value11.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.523
15/100
15%
Value17.5 s
4/100
10%
424 ms
674 ms
101 ms
39 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Litva.lt, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (961 ms) belongs to the original domain Litva.lt.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (47%)
2.2 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Litva.lt main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LITVA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 913.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 913.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litva.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 57% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (82%)
71
13
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LITVA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litva.lt
424 ms
litva.lt
674 ms
all.css
101 ms
css
39 ms
css
41 ms
css
42 ms
css
40 ms
css
44 ms
css
46 ms
css2
55 ms
css2
54 ms
css
55 ms
main.css
217 ms
jquery_3_1_1.min.js
481 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
287 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
390 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.js
296 ms
jquery.sticky.js
292 ms
jquery-ui.css
315 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
771 ms
simditor.css
387 ms
module.js
395 ms
hotkeys.js
409 ms
uploader.js
495 ms
simditor.js
668 ms
intlTelInput.css
495 ms
jquery-ui.multidatespicker.css
504 ms
jquery-ui.multidatespicker.js
571 ms
jquery.simpleselect.css
574 ms
jquery.simpleselect.js
587 ms
thumbprint.js
601 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
665 ms
swipebox.css
668 ms
snowflakes.js
681 ms
hearts.js
697 ms
main.js
852 ms
jquery.qtip.js
761 ms
jquery.qtip.css
762 ms
html2canvas.min.js
961 ms
js
68 ms
fbevents.js
60 ms
flag_lt.png
130 ms
flag_en.png
130 ms
flag_ru.png
129 ms
logo_facebook.png
130 ms
1.png
130 ms
2.png
129 ms
3.png
223 ms
001.jpg
309 ms
sdk.js
58 ms
watch.js
12 ms
bat.js
117 ms
i_youtube4.png
208 ms
i_facebook.png
205 ms
logo.png
205 ms
i_down.png
204 ms
i_main_2000.jpg
763 ms
pplogo.png
310 ms
closephoto.png
259 ms
photoleft.png
260 ms
photoright.png
264 ms
wait_animation.svg
349 ms
arrowup.png
355 ms
close.png
355 ms
left.png
357 ms
right.png
361 ms
d_sel.jpg
443 ms
i_big.png
449 ms
minus.png
450 ms
plus.png
453 ms
i_small.png
456 ms
i_down3.png
537 ms
rem.png
543 ms
dg45_pLmvrkcOkBnKsOzXyGWTBcmg-X6VjbYIg.ttf
94 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
630 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBD5Xk.ttf
103 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBD5Xk.ttf
104 ms
z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhPuI.ttf
104 ms
z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmPuI.ttf
105 ms
sdk.js
13 ms
RLpxK5Pv5qumeVJizTE.ttf
48 ms
litva.lt accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
litva.lt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
litva.lt SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litva.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litva.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litva.lt
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LITVA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: