2.7 sec in total
134 ms
990 ms
1.6 sec
Visit liveaction.com now to see the best up-to-date Live Action content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about liveaction.com
LiveAction is an award-winning software company designed to simplify real-time analytics, network monitoring, and application performance management.
Visit liveaction.comWe analyzed Liveaction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
liveaction.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value18.9 s
0/100
10%
Value13,350 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.443
21/100
15%
Value27.5 s
0/100
10%
134 ms
112 ms
178 ms
105 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Liveaction.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Edge.marker.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (331 ms) belongs to the original domain Liveaction.com.
Page size can be reduced by 154.5 kB (26%)
595.3 kB
440.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Liveaction.com main page is 595.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 270.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 153.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 153.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Live Action images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 243 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 746 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liveaction.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (64%)
88
32
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Action. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
liveaction.com
134 ms
www.liveaction.com
112 ms
www.liveaction.com
178 ms
gtm.js
105 ms
shim.js
76 ms
style.min.css
31 ms
style.min.css
63 ms
lottiefiles-frontend.css.css
50 ms
style.css
57 ms
fonts.css
58 ms
footer.css
67 ms
header.css
59 ms
resources.css
120 ms
section.css
102 ms
pfa.css
109 ms
pfafull.css
82 ms
flickity.css
96 ms
slick.css
73 ms
basic.min.css
96 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
118 ms
theme.min.css
120 ms
pum-site-styles.css
133 ms
frontend-helper.js
126 ms
jquery.min.js
132 ms
jquery.json.min.js
226 ms
gravityforms.min.js
226 ms
conditional_logic.min.js
227 ms
utils.min.js
225 ms
content.css
223 ms
columns.css
219 ms
testimonials.css
222 ms
row.css
222 ms
logos.css
224 ms
cta.css
225 ms
lottiefiles-player.js
233 ms
lottiefiles-interactivity.js
223 ms
script.js
238 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
231 ms
slick.min.js
236 ms
resourcefilter.js
236 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
331 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
207 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
199 ms
dom-ready.min.js
198 ms
hooks.min.js
199 ms
i18n.min.js
297 ms
a11y.min.js
296 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
286 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
278 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
261 ms
core.min.js
294 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
294 ms
logos.js
285 ms
logo-forrester.svg
264 ms
ld-book-v2.js
215 ms
announcement-bar-exit.svg
202 ms
liveaction.svg
203 ms
livenx.svg
166 ms
livewire.svg
205 ms
livesp.svg
209 ms
omnipeek.svg
211 ms
Brother1816-Book.ttf
207 ms
Brother1816-Medium.ttf
210 ms
NPM-Infographic-Resources.jpg
203 ms
ui-search-light.svg
229 ms
demo-arrow.svg
229 ms
interactive-demos-icon.svg
230 ms
live-demo-icon.svg
231 ms
ui-nav.svg
229 ms
LA-Flow-960x894_2.svg
232 ms
icon-roi.svg
240 ms
icon-mttr.svg
231 ms
icon-payback.svg
234 ms
arrow-left.svg
232 ms
arrow-right.svg
232 ms
la-comprehensive-network-visibility.svg
233 ms
logo-salesforce.svg
237 ms
logo-raymond-james.svg
238 ms
logo-honeywell.svg
239 ms
logo-pnc.svg
240 ms
logo-ntt.svg
241 ms
logo-ibm.svg
161 ms
logo-nestle.svg
156 ms
logo-corning.svg
139 ms
logo-fedex.svg
138 ms
logo-ford.svg
153 ms
logo-duke-energy.svg
157 ms
DMSans-Regular.ttf
134 ms
DMSans-Medium.ttf
130 ms
DMSans-Bold.ttf
131 ms
logo-bhp.svg
96 ms
logo-bausch_lomb.svg
150 ms
livenx-animation.svg
104 ms
livewire-animation.svg
96 ms
cta-home-1.webp
109 ms
quote-inverted.svg
106 ms
logo-forrester.svg
110 ms
liveaction.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
liveaction.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
liveaction.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liveaction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liveaction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liveaction.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Live Action. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: