1.4 sec in total
35 ms
1 sec
406 ms
Welcome to liveanswering.net homepage info - get ready to check Live Answering best content right away, or after learning these important things about liveanswering.net
America's premier provider of quality 24 hour live answering services for any business. No Contracts & Free 7-Day Trial. #1 Business answering service.
Visit liveanswering.netWe analyzed Liveanswering.net page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
liveanswering.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.403
25/100
15%
Value6.8 s
56/100
10%
35 ms
477 ms
14 ms
63 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Liveanswering.net, 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (477 ms) belongs to the original domain Liveanswering.net.
Page size can be reduced by 152.2 kB (25%)
607.6 kB
455.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Liveanswering.net main page is 607.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 232.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Live Answering needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 41.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liveanswering.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (63%)
70
26
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Answering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
liveanswering.net
35 ms
liveanswering.net
477 ms
style.css
14 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
63 ms
formidablepro.css
70 ms
style.min.css
90 ms
styles.css
90 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.css
90 ms
font-awesome.min.css
120 ms
style.css
95 ms
tab_css.css
100 ms
style.css
104 ms
bootstrap.min.css
107 ms
toastr.min.css
104 ms
form-basic.min.css
102 ms
addtoany.min.css
103 ms
jquery.js
126 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
139 ms
jquery.min.js
146 ms
bootstrap.min.js
144 ms
mouseywheel.js
142 ms
timepicker.js
143 ms
validation.js
143 ms
main.js
160 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
159 ms
affiliate_platform_style.css
158 ms
dropdown.js
157 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
164 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
164 ms
script.js
171 ms
superfish.js
171 ms
jquery.form.js
194 ms
scripts.js
192 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.js
192 ms
toastr.min.js
152 ms
wp-embed.min.js
197 ms
forms-api.min.js
196 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
254 ms
analytics.js
190 ms
tabs_2.png
239 ms
page.js
217 ms
bg.png
121 ms
header.jpg
121 ms
answering-service.png
168 ms
answering-services-e1290589372702.jpg
122 ms
search.png
120 ms
nav.png
120 ms
wrap_home.jpg
167 ms
live-answering-service.jpg
167 ms
subscribe.png
170 ms
hpbottom.png
166 ms
service_icon.png
166 ms
read_more_button.png
213 ms
service_icon02.png
211 ms
service_icon03.png
213 ms
service_icon04.png
213 ms
service_icon05.png
210 ms
service_icon06.png
210 ms
icon-pre.png
224 ms
icon-next.png
218 ms
business-answering-services.png
227 ms
3.png
227 ms
credit_card.png
227 ms
footer.png
227 ms
mobile.png
227 ms
arrow_sep.png
230 ms
social_icon.png
229 ms
tabs_1.png
128 ms
collect
73 ms
js
71 ms
sm.25.html
55 ms
eso.D0Uc7kY6.js
36 ms
liveanswering.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
liveanswering.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
liveanswering.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liveanswering.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liveanswering.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liveanswering.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Live Answering. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: