Tools & Wizards About Us
livefit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

livefit.com

G&G Fitness Equipment Home & Commercial Sales & Service

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

427 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

310 ms

livefit.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Livefit content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livefit.com

Home & Commercial Fitness Equipment- Treadmills, ellipticals, exercise bikes, home gyms, rowers, weights. Life Fitness, Precor, Matrix, Octane, Inspire, WaterRower, Gronk Fitness, Horizon, Echelon. Ne...

Visit livefit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Livefit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 427 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livefit.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,220 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livefit.com

427 ms

ccm.base.css

65 ms

jquery.js

197 ms

ccm.base.js

132 ms

bootstrap.css

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Livefit.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (680 ms) belongs to the original domain Livefit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 255.1 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Livefit.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 7.4 kB
  • After minification 6.6 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 824 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livefit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 63.1 kB

  • Original 97.9 kB
  • After minification 97.1 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 181.7 kB

  • Original 211.8 kB
  • After minification 172.7 kB
  • After compression 30.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livefit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 181.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (33%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livefit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

livefit.com

livefit.com

427 ms

ccm.base.css

ccm.base.css

65 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

197 ms

ccm.base.js

ccm.base.js

132 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

195 ms

main.css

main.css

128 ms

splash.css

splash.css

128 ms

typography.css

typography.css

128 ms

splash.js

splash.js

190 ms

commercial.jpg

commercial.jpg

678 ms

residential.jpg

residential.jpg

680 ms

slider.png

slider.png

67 ms

GG-Fitness-Dual-Logos-footer.png

GG-Fitness-Dual-Logos-footer.png

66 ms

Accessibility Review

livefit.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

livefit.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

livefit.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livefit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livefit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

livefit.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livefit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: