Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

livefoot.com

BeTomorrow • Agence Tech & Innovation Digitale • Stratégie, Développement IT, Data, Design et Marketing

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

351 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

livefoot.com screenshot

About Website

Visit livefoot.com now to see the best up-to-date Livefoot content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livefoot.com

Explorez l'expertise d'une agence digitale spécialisée en Développement Web et mobile, Design, Conseil stratégique, Data Science, IA, Réalité virtuelle et augmentée. Transformez votre vision...

Visit livefoot.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Livefoot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 351 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livefoot.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,840 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.betomorrow.com

351 ms

darcula.min.css

92 ms

p.css

101 ms

js

201 ms

polyfill-aa1f2378e834344e5f4c.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Livefoot.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat and 5% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (743 ms) relates to the external source Betomorrow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.4 kB (35%)

Content Size

867.4 kB

After Optimization

563.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Livefoot.com main page is 867.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 574.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 164.7 kB

  • Original 196.6 kB
  • After minification 196.4 kB
  • After compression 31.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 126.7 kB

  • Original 574.7 kB
  • After minification 448.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Livefoot needs image optimization as it can save up to 126.7 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 513 B

  • Original 38.1 kB
  • After minification 38.1 kB
  • After compression 37.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 58.0 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB
  • After compression 45.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livefoot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (55%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livefoot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

livefoot.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

livefoot.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

livefoot.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livefoot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livefoot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Livefoot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: