3.5 sec in total
351 ms
1.7 sec
1.5 sec
Visit livefoot.com now to see the best up-to-date Livefoot content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livefoot.com
Explorez l'expertise d'une agence digitale spécialisée en Développement Web et mobile, Design, Conseil stratégique, Data Science, IA, Réalité virtuelle et augmentée. Transformez votre vision...
Visit livefoot.comWe analyzed Livefoot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 351 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
livefoot.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value1,840 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
351 ms
92 ms
101 ms
201 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Livefoot.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat and 5% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (743 ms) relates to the external source Betomorrow.com.
Page size can be reduced by 304.4 kB (35%)
867.4 kB
563.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Livefoot.com main page is 867.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 574.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 164.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Livefoot needs image optimization as it can save up to 126.7 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 513 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livefoot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (55%)
38
17
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livefoot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.betomorrow.com
351 ms
darcula.min.css
92 ms
p.css
101 ms
js
201 ms
polyfill-aa1f2378e834344e5f4c.js
24 ms
component---src-components-home-page-index-tsx-d268aeb8006e9d49c6d8.js
52 ms
e6b6f2b3e6bc62383467c1c71e6461cc62ae5345-cef70c04a71545a72b6a.js
55 ms
26d043090597bdb323f876e589ddcd0a4aaad910-b809dc6d00f84900a382.js
44 ms
4c357fe4fd562c361f223b20e0248f6632ee3f7a-f4bf4219f6dd2811c01b.js
57 ms
716c5199c3ee3baeffea47c9ac12220fdc154e75-093ec60230114def394f.js
62 ms
31c45ff604252e460886f09a45058f472033d87c-224915bbed7bbcf4bef3.js
192 ms
6733f4c1328295d05eda42ba35117e43ed75231c-526e83f09c55d3513c94.js
189 ms
661e3f22db072f529e791f4f71611d26dad93cc4-e2a767585859f5b28a70.js
192 ms
bbc6e56ece1e55c26c7d863545fcb7d80b9dcbf9-319a2b939e8373ccebd1.js
200 ms
c98dffe2f860fd374557bcb68fca91e9e2262a5f-2a98cd137c6e9e07ceaa.js
190 ms
46f50a3dc99041ac3a66a781d8a562f7943915b0-6e1d99eca10e6565f6bb.js
255 ms
commons-e4fbff1838cf6be7396d.js
200 ms
52066749-cf454307e4b625e24bab.js
199 ms
05d954cf-e6305b91896523b716bb.js
199 ms
app-5a867436904843869d90.js
237 ms
framework-6fac17dbea7bdc556d15.js
251 ms
styles-161e9493f793354117a7.js
251 ms
webpack-runtime-71cd4b3a7dc562cceb08.js
243 ms
l.js
336 ms
betomorrow-white-hook.png
729 ms
home-betomorrow-team-work-in-progress-rounded.png
743 ms
expertise-icone-code.svg
220 ms
expertise-icone-oeil-vision.svg
226 ms
expertise-icone-outil-recadrage.svg
222 ms
expertise-icone-machine-cpu.svg
234 ms
expertise-icone-lunettes-realite-virtuelle.svg
228 ms
conception-application-web-mobile.png
741 ms
wo_app_4x.png
740 ms
animation_4x.png
725 ms
ui_app_actuality_motion_4x.png
726 ms
d
525 ms
d
608 ms
app-data.json
293 ms
page-data.json
294 ms
client.js
69 ms
client_legacy.css
88 ms
livefoot.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
livefoot.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
livefoot.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livefoot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livefoot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livefoot.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Livefoot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: