3.5 sec in total
305 ms
2.3 sec
824 ms
Click here to check amazing Live Kit content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livekit.io
Instantly transport audio and video between LLMs and your users.
Visit livekit.ioWe analyzed Livekit.io page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
livekit.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value1,740 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
305 ms
208 ms
234 ms
311 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Livekit.io, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Livekit.io.
Page size can be reduced by 125.0 kB (83%)
151.0 kB
26.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Livekit.io main page is 151.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 151.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 125.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (46%)
54
29
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Kit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
livekit.io
305 ms
d984d8d1bc1c576c.css
208 ms
29a220f7302df031.css
234 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
311 ms
webpack-4a2024d990a62354.js
35 ms
framework-e43bb467d280183e.js
34 ms
main-61f78bb2529126e4.js
36 ms
_app-adb929153bc9094a.js
80 ms
4648-c77b61580bd9b9a3.js
45 ms
8393-3d6451e7ca4d326d.js
46 ms
5758-85547c0984314185.js
59 ms
4505-8c1c4bd838e5d8c4.js
62 ms
6497-67def53636034ae2.js
71 ms
4121-b4b34068fc3af7db.js
72 ms
index-eea87a735a6e9c0e.js
86 ms
_buildManifest.js
91 ms
_ssgManifest.js
110 ms
spotify.svg
363 ms
meta.svg
367 ms
ebay.svg
364 ms
bbc.svg
403 ms
whatnot.svg
440 ms
gather.svg
490 ms
skydio.svg
503 ms
typeform.svg
510 ms
talkdesk.svg
515 ms
bytedance.svg
604 ms
matrix.svg
655 ms
fanatics.svg
711 ms
rumble.svg
713 ms
realtime-graphic-lg.svg
702 ms
agent-graphic-lg.svg
725 ms
ingress-graphic-lg.svg
810 ms
egress-graphic-lg.svg
876 ms
js.svg
918 ms
react.svg
924 ms
swift.svg
927 ms
android.svg
910 ms
flutter.svg
994 ms
unity.svg
1068 ms
nodejs.svg
1091 ms
go.svg
1100 ms
php.svg
1088 ms
ruby.svg
1104 ms
python.svg
1029 ms
rust.svg
1231 ms
use-cases-graphic-video-conferencing.svg
1243 ms
use-cases-graphic-livestreaming.svg
1266 ms
use-cases-graphic-artificial-intelligence.svg
1294 ms
use-cases-graphic-robotics.svg
1122 ms
css2
28 ms
use-cases-graphic-spatial.svg
1315 ms
bg-dot.svg
1287 ms
everett-regular.woff
1253 ms
everett-light.woff
1288 ms
everett-medium.woff
1184 ms
everett-bold.woff
1291 ms
everett-mono-medium.woff
1254 ms
everett-mono-regular.woff
1131 ms
everett-mono-thin.woff
1352 ms
everett-mono-bold.woff
1436 ms
intro-bg-repeat.svg
1320 ms
main.js
357 ms
livekit.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
livekit.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
livekit.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livekit.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livekit.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livekit.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Live Kit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: