Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

livelines.com

API Odds Solution by Live Lines - Sports Data API with Historical Trends

Page Load Speed

15.8 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

10.3 sec

Page Rendered

4.1 sec

livelines.com screenshot

About Website

Visit livelines.com now to see the best up-to-date Live Lines content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livelines.com

Get sports odds data including point spreads, moneylines and totals for 61 different leagues tracked in real time and with historical trending information.

Visit livelines.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Livelines.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 14.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livelines.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,530 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livelines.com

1427 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

style.min.css

207 ms

style.css

294 ms

css

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Livelines.com, 16% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Widget.livelines.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Saaslandwp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.1 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Livelines.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 819.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 91.3 kB

  • Original 105.6 kB
  • After minification 85.0 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 20.0 kB

  • Original 819.9 kB
  • After minification 799.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Live Lines images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 97.4 kB

  • Original 225.2 kB
  • After minification 214.2 kB
  • After compression 127.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.4 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 95.3 kB

  • Original 278.1 kB
  • After minification 275.0 kB
  • After compression 182.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livelines.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.3 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (69%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Lines. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

livelines.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

livelines.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

livelines.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livelines.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livelines.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Live Lines. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: