1.3 sec in total
11 ms
1.1 sec
189 ms
Welcome to livelovely.com homepage info - get ready to check Livelovely best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about livelovely.com
Use the finest apartment finder tool to search thousands of listings across the country. See ratings/reviews, HD photos/videos, compare prices, and view floor plans.
Visit livelovely.comWe analyzed Livelovely.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
livelovely.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value3.1 s
75/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value10,210 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.116
85/100
15%
Value34.1 s
0/100
10%
11 ms
220 ms
9 ms
73 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Livelovely.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (384 ms) relates to the external source Js.balancedpayments.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (53%)
2.8 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Livelovely.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Livelovely needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 48% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 240.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240.3 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livelovely.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (38%)
47
29
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livelovely. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
livelovely.com
11 ms
livelovely.com
220 ms
lovely.css
9 ms
css
73 ms
js
105 ms
balanced.min.js
384 ms
lovely.js
52 ms
analytics.min.js
84 ms
analytics.js
73 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
73 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
85 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
95 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
111 ms
Rc9nvRRh2eJAdIonmSPdA.js
121 ms
common.js
57 ms
util.js
203 ms
map.js
76 ms
poly.js
183 ms
app-banner.html
32 ms
site-header.html
47 ms
home-page.html
70 ms
app-icon.png
111 ms
icon-close@2x.png
110 ms
icon-star-full@2x.png
111 ms
lovely-logo.svg
119 ms
icon-menu@2x.png
121 ms
icon-upsell-support@2x.png
121 ms
profile-arrow.svg
123 ms
contact-default-photo.png
123 ms
collect
140 ms
btmls-site-footer-dir.html
85 ms
ng-ui-typeahead-popup-dir.html
77 ms
loading.gif
69 ms
bg-hero.jpg
82 ms
icon-current-location@2x.png
72 ms
icon-search@2x.png
71 ms
san-diego.jpg
74 ms
philadelphia.jpg
76 ms
san-francisco.jpg
74 ms
new-york.jpg
76 ms
dallas-02.jpg
77 ms
phoenix-02.jpg
78 ms
bg-mobile-android@2x.png
81 ms
icon-iphone@2x.png
78 ms
icon-android@2x.png
77 ms
cnet@2x.png
90 ms
tech-crunch@2x.png
92 ms
fortune@2x.png
88 ms
the-verge@2x.png
94 ms
fox-business@2x.png
95 ms
lovely-logo.svg
27 ms
eoh-logo@2x.png
31 ms
track.js
161 ms
livelovely.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livelovely.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
livelovely.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livelovely.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Livelovely.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
livelovely.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livelovely. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: