836 ms in total
45 ms
649 ms
142 ms
Click here to check amazing Live Score content for Azerbaijan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livescore.com
Get Live Football Scores and Real-Time Football Results with LiveScore! We cover all Countries, Leagues and Competitions in unbeatable detail. Click Now!
Visit livescore.comWe analyzed Livescore.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 791 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
livescore.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
88/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value1,610 ms
12/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
45 ms
40 ms
30 ms
26 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Livescore.com, 15% (5 requests) were made to Static.livescore.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Lsm-static-prod.livescore.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (430 ms) relates to the external source Geo.livescore.com.
Page size can be reduced by 44.1 kB (45%)
98.6 kB
54.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Livescore.com main page is 98.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 60.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Live Score images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 78 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livescore.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (65%)
31
11
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Score. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livescore.com
45 ms
40 ms
23e063f8f97783d5.css
30 ms
3cb9a7eb3fa81561.css
26 ms
62c4142e7a4fdab8.css
37 ms
b6972942a24f26df.css
50 ms
polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js
144 ms
2749.deea29155451fc31.js
124 ms
webpack-6531b962625aec8b.js
124 ms
framework-a2363dd3c3dbe572.js
182 ms
main-cae712edaad9a1da.js
180 ms
_app-f34afa4feb6be0ca.js
208 ms
commons-9723c739613b6197.js
205 ms
8404-c4d05c9d7b965ce1.js
206 ms
index-0c0408453e1bbe42.js
285 ms
_buildManifest.js
195 ms
_ssgManifest.js
194 ms
430 ms
england.jpg
426 ms
10260.png
421 ms
champions-league.jpg
401 ms
spain.jpg
405 ms
italy.jpg
404 ms
germany.jpg
403 ms
hamburger-menu-09595bd28744ad1fa99a010f1f41f34b.svg
207 ms
livescore-logo-b3b211143dccd9e22d164701d32a390f.svg
184 ms
mobile-search-2b729ef15856930595249a3c2bab7161.svg
199 ms
live-9cc2fb1af6dcface698283d0ec166775.svg
198 ms
calendar-62a86ad26c51fe49ea1c6abb202a15b4.svg
197 ms
8650.png
388 ms
9825.png
388 ms
8633.png
390 ms
8634.png
387 ms
livescore.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livescore.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
livescore.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livescore.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livescore.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livescore.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Live Score. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: